Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Simi and Leon Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$478k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.1MReligion$1.7MHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $405k
  • $250k+2 grants · $728k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OJC FUND$477,500
BAS MIKROH$250,000
YESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEY$150,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CONG PEER BAIS YAAKOV$100,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
PLEDGER CHARITABLE$3,600
ANSHEI CHESED INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 3 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
17

Total granted

$410k
$956k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-6%

Still filing today

33%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $559k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $304k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +8%
  • AC
    ANSHEI CHESED INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k

Funded once

  • BM
    BAIS MIKROH
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • GO
    GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $260k · revenue -6%
  • YO
    YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
2
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
5
Taharusam Inc

To promote authentic orthodox judaisim by helping fund jewish causes worldwide.

Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
7
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
8
Yeshivat Aish Hatorah

The organization was established to broaden the knowledge of jewish individuals to their heritage. the organization provides seminars and courses in jewish history and the torah.

Education
9
Partners Charity Fund for Israel

To support charitable organization and programs providing food, clothing and financial aid to indigent individuals and families in financial distress.

Philanthropy
10
Chevra-Kadisha Yerushalayim Inc

To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…

Philanthropy
11
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
12
American Friends of Yeshivath Kerem B'yavneh Inc

To provide grants to religious schools providing higher education

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agudath Israel of America; the most unlike its peers is Torah Live Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OJC FUND: $3,052,500 · EducationTHE OJC FUNDBAIS MIKROH: $400,000 · OtherBAIS MIKROHIndividual grant recipient: $304,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION MASORES HACHINUCH INC: $250,000 · OtherCONGREGATION MASORES HACHINUCH INCAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $175,000 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICAYESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEY: $150,000 · OtherYESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEYYESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INC: $100,000 · OtherYESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INCCONG PEER BAIS YAAKOV: $100,000 · OtherCONG PEER BAIS YAAKOV+14 more: $244,600 · Other+14 moreGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $260,000 · Religion+2 more: $5,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $100,000 · InternationalTEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Education$3,052,500Other$1,723,600Religion$265,000International$100,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $3,052,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $260,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG CHASDEI YISROEL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTORAH LIVE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds TEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD ↗
  • Who funds CONG CHASDEI YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH LIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Simi and Leon Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Simi and Leon Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Simi and Leon Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Simi and Leon Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Simi and Leon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph