Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Silver Lining Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$354k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MReligion$314kEducation$164kRecreation & Sports$140kHousing & Shelter$23kAnimals$20kYouth Development$19kMembership Benefit$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$9,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLL Global Research Foundation$100,000
Georgia Southern Athletic Foundation$100,000
Wesley Chapel Church$33,745
Individual grant recipient$27,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Rock Church$10,000
Life Line Animal Project$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Second Harvest$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,300
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATURE WORKS BEST CANCER CLINIC: $20k → 11%BEST DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CLL GLOBAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 16%FRANKIE'S FRIENDS: $3k → 13%CRU: $2k → 8%DAISY'S TALE: $2k → 12%HUNGRY FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 8%AMOR REAL MINISTRIES: $3k → 4%GEORGIA NATIONAL CEMETERY AC: $10k → 6%BACKPACK BUDDIES: $10k → 8%ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH: $2k → 8%C&C FENCE COMPANY: $8k → 8%PACE LODGE # 558: $1k → 12%Wesley Chapel Church: $34k → 13%DEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 14%Second Harvest: $6k → 14%SAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER: $2k → 16%BUTLER BALL COALITION: $2k → 23%BROOKLET UNITED METHODIST: $1k → 24%Georgia College & State University: $2k → 24%Rock Church: $10k → 11%CLL GLOBAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 16%WAKE FOR WARRIORS INC: $2k → 6%WESLEY CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $168k → 8%CAMPUS OUTREACH ATLANTA: $3k → 13%WESLEY CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7k → 13%Life Line Animal Project: $10k → 14%SAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER: $2k → 16%CLL GLOBAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 16%WESLEY CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $8k → 8%CAMPUS OUTREACH ATLANTA: $2k → 13%LIBERTY CHAPEL CHURCH: $6k → 13%WESLEY CHAPEL CHURCH: $8k → 14%VSU FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%CLL GLOBAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250k → 16%WESLEY CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 8%CAMPUS OUTREACH ATLANTA: $1k → 13%WESLEY CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 13%CLL Global Research Foundation: $175k → 16%Wesley Chapel United Methodist Church: $4k → 13%CLL Global Research Foundation: $100k → 16%PUTNAM COUNTY TAX COMMISSIONER: $2k → 13%PITTMAN PARK UNITED METHODIST: $2k → 24%STATESBORO FIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 24%EMIT GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 24%Georgia Southern Athletic Foundation: $100k → 24%GEORGIA SOUTHERN: $31k → 24%EASTERN HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
CA
UT
AZ
KS
TN
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of The Silver Lining Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Silver Lining Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 35 repeat orgs$519k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
85

Total granted

$1.9M
$364k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
-18%

Still filing today

6%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthPublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    CLL Global Research Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +74%
  • WC
    WESLEY CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCH
    6× · 2017–2023 · $194k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2017–2022 · $64k

Funded once

  • GS
    GEORGIA SOUTHERN
    one grant, 2020 · $31k
  • TW
    TEXAS WOMENS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • NW
    NATURE WORKS BEST CANCER CLINIC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aspca Veterinary Services of North Carolina Pc

Aspca veterinary services of north carolina, p.c. is a professional corporation that provides the veterinary services of qualified, licensed veterinarians exclusively to the aspca in north carolina. these services include the veterinary…

Animals
2
Saving Georgia Dogs Inc

The organization retrieves dogs from kill shelters and transports them to non kill shelters in the northern part of the united states. the dogs are then adopted. the adoption rate for the southern states is considerably lower than the…

Animals
3
Atlanta Wild Animal Rescue Effort Inc

Rehabilitate georgia's injured and orphaned native wildlife and educate the community about habitat preservation and peaceful coexistence.

Animals
4
Animal Welfare Society of South Fla Inc

To provide low-cost medical care to animals from low income families or stray and abandoned animals.

Animals
5
National Canine Cancer Foundation Inc

The National Canine Cancer Foundation strives to eliminate cancer as a major health problem in dogs through education outreach and research. They also help save lives through prevention finding cures better treatments more accurate cost…

Health
6
Animal Adoption & Rescue Foundation of Winston-Salem Inc

Aarf is a nonprofit organization serving the winston-salem area dedicated to finding loving homes for dogs and cats through rescue, foster care, veterinary services, adoption, and education.

Animals
7
The Good Samaritan Health Center Inc

Spreading Christs love through quality healthcare to those in need. We are a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization that is a health care home providing comprehensive primary care to low-income, uninsured individuals in greater metropolitan…

Health
8
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
9
No Kill Glynn County Inc

Dedicated to saving the lives of the homeless animals in Glynn County, GA. We will do this through fundraising, partnering with other organizations, leveraging resources, educating the public, and embracing and employing 'best practices'…

Animals
10
Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

The mission of the Atlanta Humane Society is to improve animal welfare in the southeastern United States by providing quality animal services including preventative initiatives, education, advocacy and adoption of animals into permanent…

Animals
11
Seattle Animal Shelter Foundation

Seattle animal foundation (saf) is on a mission to make sure every animal finds the love, care, and forever home they deserve. since 2010, we have been a not-for-profit organization raising critical funds to support life-saving programs,…

Animals
12
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Northside Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Second Harvest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLL Global Research Foundation: $1,275,000 · HealthCLL Global Research Foundation+1 more: $500 · HealthWESLEY CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCH: $193,833 · OtherWESLEY CHAPEL METHODIST CHURCHGeorgia Southern University Athletic Foundation Inc: $100,000 · OtherGeorgia Southern University Athletic Foundation IncIndividual grant recipient: $64,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $51,700 · OtherWesley Chapel Church: $41,245 · Other+117 more: $680,372 · Other+117 moreLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · AnimalsSAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER INC: $4,000 · AnimalsFRANKIE'S FRIENDS INC: $2,500 · AnimalsSECOND HARVEST INC: $6,000 · Food & NutritionWAKE FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,000 · Public Benefit
Health$1,275,500Other$1,131,200Animals$16,500Food & Nutrition$6,000Public Benefit$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLL Global Research Foundation: $1,275,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetGeorgia Southern University Athletic Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INC: $6,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFRANKIE'S FRIENDS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLL Global Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Southern University Athletic Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Silver Lining Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Silver Lining Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 129 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Silver Lining’s filings →

    More from the funding graph