Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Silvene Bracalente Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$187kEmployment$102kHealth$40kReligion$25kCommunity Improvement$8kInternational$3kHuman Services$2kScience & Tech$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $129k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETHLEHEM AREA VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL$17,000
LCTI$17,000
NORTH MONTCO TECHNICAL CAREER CENTER$17,000
THADDEUS STEVENS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$17,000
WESTERN MONTOGMERY CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER$17,000
UPPER BUCKS COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOL$17,000
WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES$17,000
PENN COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$10,000
ST ISIDORE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
CAREER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,000
CHRIST CHURCH OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$1,000
CHRIST EVANGICAL LUTHERN CHURCH$1,000
TEAM EMMA 4EVER FIGHTING CHILDHOOD CANCER$750
Individual grant recipient$500
PALISADES HIGH SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALONG THE WAY INC: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 18 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
19

Total granted

$340k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+57%

Still filing today

28%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationEmploymentArts & CulturePublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BETHLEHEM AREA VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL BRIDGES FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +170%
  • TO
    TAILS OF VALOR PAWS OF HONOR PROGRAM IN
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +89%
  • TO
    THE OPEN LINK INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • MR
    MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • WM
    WESTERN MONTGOMERY CAREER TECHNICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Delaware Valley Regional High School Education Association Phila
Education
3
Pittsburgh Venture Capital Association

The pittsburgh venture capital association was founded in 1982 to catalyze venture investment and entrepreneurialism in western pennsylvania. since then it has become the leading voice of private equity investors in the region.through a…

—
4
Pittsburgh Works Together Inc

Educate and advocate on behalf of the construction, energy, and manufacturing industries and the resulting economic and job growth in pennsylvania.

Community Improvement
5
Upper Perkiomen Valley Chamber of Commerce Inc

Providing leadership and vision to foster economic vitality and enrich the quality of life in the upper perkiomen valley.

Community Improvement
6
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
7
Polish Army Veterans Association of America Foundation Inc
Arts & Culture
8
The Manufacturing Academy
Employment
9
Pittsburgh Technology Council

Membership organization formed to help tech companies succeed through a proven platform of business development, talent retention, government relations, and visibility services. companies at all growth stages use the pittsburgh technology…

—
10
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
11
Transfer Volunteer Fire Department

Provide public safety services in areas of fire protection, rescue, emergency management, and public fire education training for the township of transfer.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Mantec Inc

Accelerating manufacturing excellence.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pediatric Cancer Foundation of the Lehigh Valley; the most unlike its peers is Team Emma 4EVER Fighting Childhood Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THADDEUS STEVENS COLLEGE OF TECH: $41,500 · OtherTHADDEUS STEVENS COLLEGE OF TECHUPPER BUCKS COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOL: $38,000 · OtherUPPER BUCKS COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOLNORTH MONTCO TECHNICAL CAREER CENTER: $36,500 · OtherNORTH MONTCO TECHNICAL CAREER CENTERPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $33,500 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYLCTI: $31,750 · OtherLCTIWESTERN MONTOGMERY CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $29,500 · OtherWESTERN MONTOGMERY CAREER AND TECHNOLOGY CENTERCAREER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $23,000 · OtherCAREER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYST ISIDORE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherST ISIDORE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH+24 more: $39,100 · Other+24 moreBETHLEHEM AREA VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL BRIDGES FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · PhilanthropyBETHLEHEM …TEAM EMMA 4EVER FIGHTING CHILDHOOD CANCER: $3,250 · PhilanthropyTEAM EMMA …WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $32,500 · EducationWILLIAMSO…TAILS OF VALOR PAWS OF HONOR PROGRAM IN: $3,785 · Public BenefitPMPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EmploymentTHE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSELLERSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $320 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$293,850Philanthropy$35,250Education$32,500Public Benefit$3,785Employment$2,500Arts & Culture$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$320

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $32,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM AREA VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL BRIDGES FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetMANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTAILS OF VALOR PAWS OF HONOR PROGRAM IN: $3,785 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM EMMA 4EVER FIGHTING CHILDHOOD CANCER: $3,250 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL RESOURCE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPMPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OPEN LINK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSELLERSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALONG THE WAY: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM AREA VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL BRIDGES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANUFACTURERS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TAILS OF VALOR PAWS OF HONOR PROGRAM IN ↗
  • Who funds TEAM EMMA 4EVER FIGHTING CHILDHOOD CANCER ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds PMPA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN LINK INC ↗
  • Who funds SELLERSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds ALONG THE WAY ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Air Products FoundationPA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Air Products Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Silvene Bracalente Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Silvene Bracalente Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Silvene Bracalente Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph