Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shure and Richardson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$53kReligion$13kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$4kYouth Development$2kHealth$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS PRIORY SCHOOL$20,980
IMMACOLATA CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,200
ST JOSEPHS ACADEMY$8,001
ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES$4,000
CHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$500
NATIVITY OF OUR LORD$500
FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$500
BETHANY UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$300
ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM$250
KNIGHTS BASKETBALL ACADEMY$200
UPLIFT CARE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $500 → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$49k · 9 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$49k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+42%

Still filing today

11%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS ABBEY PRIORY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $18k
  • IC
    IMMACOLATA CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPHS ACADEMY
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS ROCKETS HOCKEY CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CM
    CARMELITE MONASTERY
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • RT
    Ranken Technical Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
3
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
4
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
5
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Ssm-Sluh Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
9
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University

University is a 4 year private catholic institution, offering degrees in nursing, health/behavioral sciences, & humanities. the college is an integral part of the fmol health system.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Francis Community Services; the most unlike its peers is Franklin County Humane Society of Missouri. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUIS PRIORY SCHOOL: $20,980 · OtherST LOUIS PRIORY SCHOOLST LOUIS ABBEY PRIORY: $17,850 · OtherST LOUIS ABBEY PRIORYIMMACOLATA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10,700 · OtherIMMACOLATA CATHOLIC CHURCHST JOSEPHS ACADEMY: $9,501 · OtherST JOSEPHS ACADEMYTHE MUNY MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOC: $5,000 · OtherTHE MUNY MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,000 · OtherST LOUIS ROCKETS HOCKEY CLUB: $3,000 · Other+20 more: $9,735 · Other+20 moreRanken Technical College: $1,000 · EducationCOEUR ACADEMY: $100 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $50 · EducationPEDAL THE CAUSE: $700 · Human ServicesMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $600 · Arts & CultureGRACE'S PLACE INC: $100 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $100 · HealthFRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $75 · Animals
Other$80,766Education$1,150Human Services$700Arts & Culture$600Public Safety & Disaster$100Health$100Animals$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRanken Technical College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE'S PLACE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Ranken Technical College ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COEUR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GRACE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shure and Richardson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shure and Richardson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shure and Richardson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph