Skip to content

· Public charity

The Shumard Foundation Inc

The shumard foundation, inc.

$1.5M
Granted FY2022
39
Grants FY2022
11
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of The Shumard Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Servant Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Shumard Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 33 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

35
’17
37
’18
35
’19
34
’20
34
’21
33
’22
12
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$8.7MReligion$2.6MHuman Services$885kPhilanthropy$443kHealth$365kFood & Nutrition$318kInternational$269kHousing & Shelter$188kOther$0
02FY2022 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 39 grants below total $1,469,298, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,526,398 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $57,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $518k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $427k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY$500,000
LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY$171,628
LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY$100,000
HOMEWOOD CHURCH OF CHRIST$55,000
GULF COST CHURCH OF CHRIST$50,000
NEIGHBORHOOD COOPERATIVE MINISTRY INC$50,000
HARDING UNIVERSITY$47,020
THE EXTENSION INC$30,000
HIS WAY RECOVERY CENTER OF GEORGIA INC$30,000
NORTH ATLANTA CHURCH OF CHRIST$28,000
PREDISAN USA INC$27,500
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY$25,000
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER$25,000
SERVANT FOUNDATION DBA THE SIGNATRY$25,000
LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARRIAGE HELPER INC: $10k → 4%MARRIAGE HELPER INC: $10k → 4%MARRIAGE HELPER INC: $10k → 4%MARRIAGE HELPER INC: $10k → 4%PATHWAYS2LIFE: $13k → 9%MARRIAGE HELPER INC: $10k → 4%PILLAR OF LEGACY INC: $10k → 9%MARRIAGE HELPER INC: $10k → 4%PATHWAYS2LIFE: $13k → 9%PILLAR OF LEGACY INC: $5k → 9%PATHWAYS2LIFE: $13k → 9%PILLAR OF LEGACY INC: $4k → 9%PATHWAYS2LIFE: $3k → 9%ASSOCIATION FOR GUIDANCE AID PLACEMENT & EMPATHY: $10k → 14%ASSOCIATION FOR GUIDANCE AID PLACEMENT & EMPATHY: $10k → 14%ASSOCIATION FOR GUIDANCE AID PLACEMENT & EMPATHY: $10k → 14%ASSOCIATION FOR GUIDANCE AID PLACEMENT & EMPATHY: $10k → 14%THE WILL TO LIVE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
CA
WV
KS
AR
TN
NC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 43 repeat orgs$231k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2022, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
16

Total granted

$11M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+8%

Still filing today

72%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +44%
  • MH
    Mary Hall Freedom Village Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $420k · revenue +24%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $333k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SUGAR HILL
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CS
    CAMP SHILOH
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • CC
    Champions Community Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
4
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
5
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
6
His University

His university provides graduate and undergraduate degree and diploma education and training for his family ministry specialists who desire to pursue careers in counseling and ministry.

Education
7
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
8
World Hope Ministries International

Training pastors, growing churches, and transforming communities for christ.

—
9
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
10
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
11
Mid-America Christian University Inc

Mid-america christian university prepares students through a wesleyan perspective to create, collaborate, and innovate to solve local and global problems for the glory of god through jesus christ and the good of society.

—
12
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Atlanta Christian Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Corners Outreach Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/48
Grantees still filing
34/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $6,968,528 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITYOHIO VALLEY UNIVERSITY INC: $337,034 · OtherCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $332,500 · Other+36 more: $1,911,174 · Other+36 moreServant Foundation: $2,061,162 · ReligionServant FoundationMISSION UPREACH INC: $110,000 · Religion+3 more: $125,000 · Religion+3 moreGREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $251,000 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $247,500 · EducationFAULKNER UNIVERSITY: $92,000 · EducationOklahoma Christian University: $72,000 · EducationLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationMary Hall Freedom Village Inc: $420,000 · Human ServicesMARRIAGE HELPER INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION FOR GUIDANCE AID PLACEMENT AND EMPATHY: $40,000 · Human ServicesP2L INC: $40,000 · Human Services+2 more: $24,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC: $370,000 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $63,000 · PhilanthropyPREDISAN USA INC: $152,500 · InternationalAFRICA TRANSFORMATION NETWORK INC: $85,000 · InternationalHEALING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $70,000 · International+2 more: $13,800 · InternationalHEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $155,000 · HealthHIS WAY RECOVERY CENTER OF GEORGIA INC: $65,000 · Health+2 more: $10,000 · Health
Other$9,549,236Religion$2,296,162Education$712,500Human Services$584,000Philanthropy$433,000International$321,300Health$230,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $6,968,528 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetServant Foundation: $2,061,162 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMary Hall Freedom Village Inc: $420,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC: $370,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO VALLEY UNIVERSITY INC: $337,034 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $332,500 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES INC: $294,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetHarding University Inc: $286,124 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $251,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $247,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $155,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPREDISAN USA INC: $152,500 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetMISSION UPREACH INC: $110,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetThe Extension Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFAULKNER UNIVERSITY: $92,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICA TRANSFORMATION NETWORK INC: $85,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetCORNERS OUTREACH LLC: $72,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetOklahoma Christian University: $72,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCancer Research Institute of West Tennessee Inc: $67,500 over 7y, 36% of budgetHIS WAY RECOVERY CENTER OF GEORGIA INC: $65,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $63,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK: $60,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMARRIAGE HELPER INC: $60,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetEVERGREEN RETREAT CENTER INC: $50,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR GUIDANCE AID PLACEMENT AND EMPATHY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetP2L INC: $40,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetGathering Industries Inc: $35,500 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetVision Atlanta Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGEORGIA AGAPE INC: $25,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLAGRANGE ACADEMY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPILLAR OF LEGACY INC: $19,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetWellspring Living Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINISTRIES OF GRACE INC - GA: $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMANA NUTRITIVE AID PRODUCTS INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKids Prosper Kids: $10,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetRochester Christian University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WIDE YOUTH CAMPS INC: $9,800 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE WILL TO LIVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetToolbank USA Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOPEQUEST MINISTRY GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMERCY CARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAtlanta Community Toolbank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Servant Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Mary Hall Freedom Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO VALLEY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD COOPERATIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Harding University Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH TALENTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PREDISAN USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION UPREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Extension Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAULKNER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA TRANSFORMATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERS OUTREACH LLC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Christian University ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Research Institute of West Tennessee Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIS WAY RECOVERY CENTER OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MARRIAGE HELPER INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR GUIDANCE AID PLACEMENT AND EMPATHY ↗
  • Who funds P2L INC ↗
  • Who funds Gathering Industries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Vision Atlanta Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Signatry Charitable TrustSD50× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Signatry Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Fraser-Parker Foundation · J Bulow Campbell Foundation · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Frazier Foundation Inc · Stephens' Christian Trust · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shumard Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shumard Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oklahoma Christian University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Shumard Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Shumard Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shumard’s filings →

More from the funding graph