Skip to content
The Shone Family Foundation co Legacy Administration Services at a glance

· Private foundation

The Shone Family Foundation co Legacy Administration Services

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Human Services$65kRecreation & Sports$24kReligion$13kPhilanthropy$12kHealth$9kAnimals$7kCommunity Improvement$5kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2020 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,499
Traders Point Christian Church$6,889
Riley Childrens Foundation$5,200
Hamilton County Community Foundatio$5,000
Megan S Ott Foundation$3,000
First Tee of Naples$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Saint Vincent Foundation$1,000
Wounded Warrior Project$1,000
Rescue Ranch$1,000
Prevail$1,000
JDRF$1,000
ICAN$1,000
Swinging with Purpose$1,000
Fishers Church of Christ$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sacred Selections: $16k → 12%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 14%Sacred Selections: $15k → 12%Sacred Selections: $1k → 12%Prevail: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
CA
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 5 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$90k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+24%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SACRED SELECTIONS
    3× · 2018–2020 · $32k · revenue +93%
  • HC
    HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $19k · revenue +50%
  • SW
    Swinging with Purpose Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $12k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +146%
  • OM
    ONE MISSION SOCIETY USA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • GO
    Garden of Hope and Courage Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region

Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.

Human Services
2
Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc

The indiana hemophilia and thrombosis center, inc. is committed to providing the highest quality comprehensive services and holistic care to patients with bleeding, clotting and other hematologic disorders, and to their families.

Health
3
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
4
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland Foundation

Supporting planned parenthood of the heartland, inc.

—
5
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
6
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
7
Hospice of Martin & St Lucie Inc

Hospice of martin & st. lucie, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families, dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible. hospice…

Human Services
8
Pinkball Inc

PINKBALL is an organization founded by "baseball moms" who were moved to create a fund for screening and diagnostic mammograms and breast ultrasounds for women in our community who are uninsured or under insured who may not qualify for…

Health
9
Hospice of the Treasure Coast Inc

Hospice of the treasure coast, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible.

—
10
Hospice and Palliative Credentialing Center

Hpcc is the premier national credentialing organization that advances expert care in serious illness through state-of-the-art certification of continuing competency in hospice and palliative care and research.

—
11
Pet Partners

Pet partners is the national leader in demonstrating and promoting positive human-animal interactions to improve the physical, emotional and psychological lives of those we serve.

Animals
12
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Careline Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

We Can Help Inc: $15,000 · OtherWe Can Help IncSaint Vincent Foundation: $12,394 · OtherSaint Vincent FoundationSwinging with Purpose Inc: $11,750 · OtherSwinging with Purpose IncIndividual grant recipient: $7,499 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRADERS POINT CHRISTIAN CHURCH INC: $6,889 · OtherTRADERS POINT CHRISTIAN CHURCH INCRiley Childrens Foundation: $5,200 · OtherRiley Childrens FoundationONE MISSION SOCIETY USA INC: $4,000 · OtherONE MISSION SOCIETY USA INCFirst Tee of Naples: $2,500 · Other+10 more: $8,600 · Other+10 moreSACRED SELECTIONS: $32,000 · Human ServicesSACRED SELECTIONS+2 more: $2,000 · Human Services+2 moreHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $18,600 · PhilanthropyHERITAGE CLASSIC F…HAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COUNTY CO…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $5,000 · AnimalsIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsRESCUE RANCH INC: $1,000 · AnimalsMEGAN S OTT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S THERAPLAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthINDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $1,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON CONNECTION: $500 · HealthGarden of Hope and Courage Inc: $2,600 · Arts & CultureMDRC: $1,000 · EmploymentCHAMP CAMP INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$73,832Human Services$34,000Philanthropy$24,100Animals$7,000Health$5,500Arts & Culture$2,600Employment$1,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSACRED SELECTIONS: $32,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION: $18,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSwinging with Purpose Inc: $11,750 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEGAN S OTT FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGarden of Hope and Courage Inc: $2,600 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetShark Shootout Charities Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMDRC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVAIL INC OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S THERAPLAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE RANCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY CARELINE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHAMP CAMP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPINK RIBBON CONNECTION: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncUnited Way of Central…The Ackerman Foundati…Healthcare Initiative…Maurer Family Foundat…The Brave Heart Found…Hamilton County Commu…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…Natl Christian Charit…Duke Energy FoundationRaymond James Charita…The Pfizer Foundation…
Lilly Endowment IncIN18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Ackerman Foundation · Healthcare Initiatives Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shone Family Foundation co Legacy Administration Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shone Family Foundation co Legacy Administration Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shone Family Foundation co Legacy Administration Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home