Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Shoemaker Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$223kArts & Culture$110kHousing & Shelter$95kFood & Nutrition$84kPublic Safety & Disaster$58kEnvironment$18kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MATTHEWS HOUSE$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
GIRARD COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FUND$10,000
GIRARD COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$5,000
SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS & PANTRIES$5,000
ARTIS-NAPLES INC$5,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDENS$5,000
THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC$5,000
NEWTOWN FOOD PANTRY INC$5,000
GOODSPEED OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION$5,000
COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION OF MADISON COUNTY INC$5,000
FOCUS ON TANZANIAN COMMUNITIES$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cradles to Crayons: $1k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%Metropolitan Ministries: $2k → 13%Wounded Warrior Project: $500 → 14%Thames River Community Service: $3k → 9%Cradles to Crayons: $500 → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $500 → 13%American Red Cross: $10k → 14%Thames River Community Service: $2k → 9%American Red Cross: $8k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%Thames River Community Service: $1k → 9%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%American Red Cross: $3k → 14%Thames River Community Service: $1k → 9%Thames River Community Service: $500 → 9%CARE AND SHARE OF EAST LYME INC: $3k → 9%CARE AND SHARE OF EAST LYME INC: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
VA
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Shoemaker Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Shoemaker Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$585k · 25 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
8

Total granted

$585k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+127%

Still filing today

84%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $73k · revenue +242%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2018–2025 · $55k · revenue +9%
  • WI
    WONDERMORE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR WILDERNESS SAFETY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • JF
    Jazz Foundation of America Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +127%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
2
Long Island Cares Inc

Our mission is to bring together all available resources for the benefit of the hungry on Long Island, and provide to the best of our ability for the humanitarian needs of our community. We provide food when and where its needed, sponsor…

Human Services
3
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

4
Connecticut Foodshare Inc

The mission of the connecticut foodshare is to deliver an informed and equitable response to hunger by mobilizing community partners, volunteers, and supporters.

5
Open Table Inc

Open table's mission is to address hunger in our local community by providing healthy food in a welcoming environment that respects the dignity and diversity of those served. we achieve our mission by offering a wide variety of healthy and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Tewksbury Community Pantry Inc

The heart of the tewksbury community pantry's mission lies in our commitment to assist residents of tewksbury facing hardships. we extend beyond mere food distribution, offering guidance towards additional resources, ensuring our clients…

Human Services
7
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
8
Journey Home Inc

Journey home's mission is to ensure a home for all. we believe the most powerful way to do this is collectively - by working together with service providers, elected officials, businesses, and local communities to end homelessness in the…

Human Services
9
Worcester County Food Bank Inc

To engage, educate and lead worcester county in creating a hunger free community.

Food & Nutrition
10
Rachel's Table of Western Massachusetts Inc

The mission of rachel's table of western massachusetts (rtwm) is to alleviate hunger and reduce the waste of food resources in wm. rtwm takes a holistic and collaborative approach toward food security by supporting an intergenerational…

Food & Nutrition
11
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York Inc

To lead a network of partners to alleviate hunger, prevent food waste, and nourish the communities we serve. our vision is that all people have the nutritious food they need to thrive.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cradles to Crayons Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceLand Conservation Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…Community Arts OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesUnited Way FederationsPublic Library SupportAnimal Rescue and AdoptionClassical Music Ensembles
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%47%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
24/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Girard College Development Fund — $160,000 · OtherGirard College Development FundWONDERMORE INC — $33,550 · OtherWONDERMORE INCTHE HARTT SCHOOL — $20,000 · OtherTHE HARTT SCHOOL+15 more — $40,500 · Other+15 moreTHE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS & PANTRIES INC — $28,500 · Food & NutritionTHE SHORELINE …THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BANK …NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionNEWTON FOOD PA…HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN F…ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $72,500 · Housing & ShelterST MATTHEWS HO…Community Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Hous…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $55,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…Thames River Community Service Inc — $6,500 · Human ServicesThames River …Care & Share of East Lyme Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesCare & Share …+3 more — $4,000 · Human Services+3 moreGOODSPEED OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $28,500 · Arts & CultureGOODSPEED OPE…ARTIS-NAPLES INC — $26,600 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES …LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC — $11,000 · Arts & CultureLIGHTHOUSE AR…OPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC — $3,500 · Arts & CultureGIRARD COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $41,000 · EducationNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $15,000 · Environment
Other$254,050Food & Nutrition$78,500Housing & Shelter$77,500Human Services$70,500Arts & Culture$69,600Education$41,000Environment$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $72,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGIRARD COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $41,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetWONDERMORE INC — $33,550 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetTHE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS & PANTRIES INC — $28,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGOODSPEED OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $28,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC — $26,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC — $11,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThames River Community Service Inc — $6,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMartin House Inc — $6,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCare & Share of East Lyme Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST LYME PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds GIRARD COLLEGE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WONDERMORE INC
  • Who funds THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENS & PANTRIES INC
  • Who funds GOODSPEED OPERA HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC
  • Who funds NEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds Thames River Community Service Inc
  • Who funds Martin House Inc
  • Who funds Community Housing Coalition of Madison County Inc
  • Who funds Care & Share of East Lyme Inc
  • Who funds OPERA THEATER OF CONNECTICUT INC
  • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds EAST LYME PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds FOCUS ON TANZANIAN COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Jazz Foundation of America Inc
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dominion Energy Charitable FoundationVA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Chelsea Groton Foundation · Dime Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Kitchings Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Shoemaker Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Thames River Community Service Inc76% of income from government
  • Martin House Inc53% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc4% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • Goodspeed Opera House Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc0% of income from government
  • Lighthouse Artcenter Inc0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Shoemaker Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Shoemaker Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph