Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Shaw Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.8MHuman Services$2.1MEnvironment$1.6MHealth$310kArts & Culture$130kFood & Nutrition$122kInternational$45kReligion$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$247k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRETHREN VILLAGE$400,000
THE LANCASTER CONSERVANCY$398,000
GETTYSBURG COLLEGE$250,000
LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST$150,000
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
SECHLER FAMILY FOUNDATION$20,000
MESSIAH UNIVERSITY$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $7k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%BRETHREN VILLAGE: $300k → 9%BRETHREN VILLAGE: $300k → 9%BRETHREN VILLAGE: $202k → 9%UNITED CHURCHES ELIZABETHTOWN AREA: $30k → 9%BRETHREN VILLAGE: $400k → 9%BRETHREN VILLAGE: $300k → 9%BRETHREN VILLAGE: $300k → 9%BRETHREN VILLAGE: $300k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Shaw Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 91%.

The Shaw Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.8M · 7 repeat orgs$563k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$8.8M
$433k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
-11%

Still filing today

86%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BV
    BRETHREN VILLAGE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +44%
  • GC
    GETTYSBURG COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +18%
  • LF
    LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • PF
    PENNSYLVANIA FRIENDS OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -3%
  • TP
    THE POTTER'S HOUSE
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education
2
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

—
3
French and Pickering Creeks Conservation Trust Inc

To preserve, steward, and connect people to the land in northern chester county pennsylvania. see additional information on schedule o.french & pickering is recognized as a leader in regional land conservation, the organization is…

Environment
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
6
Cedar Crest College

Cedar crest college is a liberal arts college primarily for women dedicated to the education of the next generation of leaders. the college prepares students for life in a global community by educating the whole student at all stages of…

Education
7
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
8
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
9
The Trustees of the Smith College

Smith college educates women of promise for lives of distinction and purpose. a college of and for the world, smith college links the power of the liberal arts to excellence in research and scholarship, developing leaders for society's…

Education
10
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
11
Willowsford Conservancy Inc

The mission of the willowsford conservancy is to protect our land and promote conservation and sustainable farming so that our community discovers a deeper connection to nature and each other.

Environment
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Farmland Trust; the most unlike its peers is Sechler Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $2,413,400 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGEGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $2,082,100 · EducationGETTYSBURG COLLEGE+1 more: $10,000 · EducationBRETHREN VILLAGE: $2,101,500 · Human ServicesBRETHREN VILLAGE+2 more: $52,000 · Human ServicesLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $1,098,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER FARMLAND…LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $463,000 · EnvironmentLANCASTER COUNTY C…PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $660,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA…PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherPENN STATE U…THE POTTER'S HOUSE: $100,000 · OtherTHE POTTER'S…Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+10 more: $143,212 · Other+10 morePENNSYLVANIA FRIENDS OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Food & NutritionWORLD VISION INC: $45,000 · InternationalROCK FORD FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$4,505,500Human Services$2,153,500Environment$1,561,000Other$1,053,212Food & Nutrition$100,000International$45,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE: $2,413,400 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBRETHREN VILLAGE: $2,101,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $2,082,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST: $1,098,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY: $463,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA FRIENDS OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCK FORD FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetUNITED CHURCHES ELIZABETHTOWN AREA: $30,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECHLER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRETHREN VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER FARMLAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA FRIENDS OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHURCHES ELIZABETHTOWN AREA ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SECHLER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Elizabethtown Football Club Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Community FoundationPA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Shaw Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Shaw Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shaw Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph