Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Sharaby Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$158k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$98k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$774kHuman Services$8kPhilanthropy$5kEducation$2kHealth$2kCommunity Improvement$120
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $98k
$2,231
Median grant
2
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE$98,000
CONGREGATION BEIT YAAKOV$39,325
BAIS YAAKOV OF BALTIMORE$10,000
VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS$5,043
OWINGS MILLS SYNAGOGUE$2,231
THE CHESSED FUND$1,180
BAIT EDMUND JACOB SAFRA$1,104
MERCAZ TORAH UTEFILLAH$814
AISH KODESH$130
SHEARITH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$101
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE SHIDDUCH CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
NJ
CA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$734k · 22 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
33

Total granted

$734k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-8%

Still filing today

18%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $363k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BEIT YAAKOV
    5× · 2020–2024 · $208k
  • VS
    VARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BEIT EDMOND SAFRA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • CI
    Chayenu Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +95%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
4
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
7
Kollel Ohr Shmuel Inc

To learn, spread, and study torah

Religion
8
American Friends of the Torah Leadership Institute Inc

Fostering jewish education and leadership.

Religion
9
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
10
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc

To award scholarships and grants to students from the United States attending Yeshivas Gedolah Matisyahu in the State of Israel

Education
12
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Torah Schools for Israel and the most unlike its peers is The Eileen Youtie Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INC — $363,236 · OtherNER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE INCCONGREGATION BEIT YAAKOV — $208,240 · OtherCONGREGATION BEIT YAAKOVVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONS — $49,689 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL DONATIONSBAIS YAAKOV SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $40,000 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMY — $26,800 · Other+46 more — $81,383 · Other+46 moreKEREN BNEI TORAH — $13,700 · ReligionChayenu Inc — $3,600 · ReligionJEWELS SCHOOL INC — $1,200 · EducationMESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $500 · EducationTHE EILEEN YOUTIE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican Friends of Koidenov Inc — $540 · InternationalThe Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc — $500 · Human Services
Other$769,348Religion$17,300Education$1,700Philanthropy$1,000International$540Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKEREN BNEI TORAH — $13,700 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetTORAH SCHOOLS FOR ISRAEL — $4,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChayenu Inc — $3,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWELS SCHOOL INC — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EILEEN YOUTIE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC — $562 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Koidenov Inc — $540 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetShoresh Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shidduch Center of Baltimore Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMESIVTA OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KEREN BNEI TORAH
  • Who funds TORAH SCHOOLS FOR ISRAEL
  • Who funds Chayenu Inc
  • Who funds JEWELS SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE EILEEN YOUTIE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL TORAH INC
  • Who funds American Friends of Koidenov Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD33.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Gutman Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Tzedakah Fund · The Hackerman Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Preservation & Perpetuation of Torah Laws & Customs · Khosh Family Foundation Inc · Center for Jewish Education Inc · Gemsy Zay Foundation Inc · Crane Family Foundation Inc · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Sharaby Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • Jewels School Inc15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sharaby Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sharaby Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph