Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Shackouls Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$399k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$1.1MHealth$666kInternational$113kAnimals$40kHuman Services$36kScience & Tech$33kRecreation & Sports$25kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $265k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Osteosarcoma Institute$160,000
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$105,000
The George and Barbara Bush Foundation$25,000
Sigma Phi Epsilon Education$25,000
UTHealth Houston$20,000
HOUSTON MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCE$15,000
Memorial Hermann Foundation$10,000
BOTH ENDS BELIEVING$10,000
FORE THE CURE$10,000
CHANCES FOR CHILDREN$9,500
The Tau Beta Pi Association Inc$5,000
BELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC$4,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $655k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOTH ENDS BELIEVING: $25k → 5%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $280k → 24%BOTH ENDS BELIEVING: $25k → 5%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $210k → 24%BOTH ENDS BELIEVING: $10k → 5%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $105k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
VA
AZ
TN
LA
MS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 16 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
28

Total granted

$1.7M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+33%

Still filing today

81%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Mississippi State University Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $630k · revenue +82%
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    2× · 2020–2021 · $303k · revenue +47%
  • BE
    BOTH ENDS BELIEVING INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • O
    ONEGOAL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -7%
  • BE
    Both Ends Believing Inc.
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • UO
    University of Texas
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
4
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
5
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

6
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

7
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
8
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
9
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
10
TMC3 Development Corporation
Health
11
Children's Hospital Pathology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide pathology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
12
Physicians Organization at Children's Hospital Inc

The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Hermann Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Forethecure. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCollege Foundation SupportChildhood Cancer SupportChristian Outreach Ministri…Community Literacy TutoringFaith-Based Senior LivingFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Youth CampsEarly Childhood Care CentersEnvironmental Advocacy and …Education Equity InitiativesCommunity Hospital Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%56%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
24/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mississippi State University Foundation Inc — $630,000 · Human ServicesMississippi State University Foundation…BOTH ENDS BELIEVING INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesBOTH ENDS BELIEVING INC+3 more — $9,500 · Human ServicesTexas Children's Hospital — $302,850 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalTHE OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTE — $160,000 · HealthTHE OSTEOSARCOMA INSTITUTEMemorial Hermann Foundation — $60,000 · HealthMemorial Hermann Foundation+4 more — $21,000 · HealthMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY — $305,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYSigma Phi Epsilon Education — $50,000 · OtherSigma Phi Epsilon EducationUTHealth Houston — $40,000 · OtherUTHealth HoustonBoth Ends Believing Inc. — $20,000 · OtherHouston Museum of Natural Science — $32,500 · OtherHouston Museum of Natural Scien…CHANCES FOR CHILDREN — $28,000 · Other+14 more — $103,500 · Other+14 moreTHE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationSmall Steps Nurturing Center — $25,000 · EducationTHE TAU BETA PI ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $7,500 · EducationSIGMA PHI EPSILON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationWilliam Marsh Rice University — $5,000 · EducationThe Brookwood Community Inc — $5,000 · EducationONEGOAL — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentHAY Center Foundation — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORETHECURE — $30,000 · PhilanthropyMen of Distinction of Greater Houston — $7,500 · PhilanthropyBARBARA BUSH HOUSTON LITERACY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Animals
Human Services$724,500Health$543,850Other$579,000Education$92,500Youth Development$65,000Philanthropy$42,500Animals$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc — $630,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $302,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOTH ENDS BELIEVING INC — $85,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMemorial Hermann Foundation — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetONEGOAL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Museum of Natural Science — $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORETHECURE — $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCHANCES FOR CHILDREN — $28,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAU BETA PI ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $18,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBELLA BOWMAN FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCandlelighters Childhood Cancer Family Alliance — $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMen of Distinction of Greater Houston — $7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIGMA PHI EPSILON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Aranzazu Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBARBARA BUSH HOUSTON LITERACY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAY Center Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Blue Bird Circle — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Aphasia Recovery Center — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Coneway Family Foundation · Texas Children's Hospital · Strake Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Shackouls Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Shackouls Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Shackouls Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph