Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Schnabel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of The Schnabel Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to International Christian Concern Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Schnabel Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $60k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
9
’18
9
’19
9
’20
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$87kReligion$86kHuman Services$47kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k11 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$361k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOSHUA HOUSE LIFE CENTERS$15,000
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN$10,000
LIGHT FOR THE BLIND$5,000
INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION$5,000
CRISIS AID INTERNATIONAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GNBC INTERNATIONAL$4,000
ADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES ANGLICAN$1,000
CENTRAL UNION MISSION$1,000
LAKESIDE REGIONAL CHURCH$1,000
WINDOWS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LAKESIDE REGIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 10%CENTRAL UNION MISSION: $1k → 14%JOSHUA HOUSE LIFE CENTERS: $15k → 9%GNBC INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 4%CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES ANGLICAN: $1k → 6%INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION: $6k → 8%KING OF THE NATIONS CHRISTIAN FELLO: $15k → 8%LAKESIDE REGIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 10%CENTRAL UNION MISSION: $1k → 14%JOSHUA HOUSE LIFE CENTERS: $12k → 9%GNBC INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 4%INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION: $6k → 8%KING OF THE NATIONS CHRISTIAN FELLO: $10k → 8%LAKESIDE REGIONAL CHURCH: $1k → 10%CENTRAL UNION MISSION: $500 → 14%JOSHUA HOUSE LIFE CENTERS: $12k → 9%INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION: $5k → 8%LAKESIDE REGIONAL CHURCH: $500 → 10%CENTRAL UNION MISSION: $500 → 14%JOSHUA HOUSE LIFE CENTERS: $8k → 9%INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION: $5k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $15k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $14k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $10k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN: $8k → 14%INFAITH MATHIEU: $5k → 14%INFAITH MATHIEU: $5k → 14%INFAITH MATHIEU: $5k → 14%INFAITH MATHIEU: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 13 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$223k
$1k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $23k · revenue +20%
  • OD
    Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc
    4× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +42%
  • GI
    GNBC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES ANGLICAN
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
3
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
4
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
5
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
8
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
9
International Church Missions

Proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ evangelism discipleship and church planting

International
10
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
11
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
12
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Christian Concern Inc; the most unlike its peers is Window International Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOSHUA HOUSE LIFE CENTERS: $47,000 · OtherJOSHUA HOUSE LIFE CENTERSIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKING OF THE NATIONS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $25,000 · OtherKING OF THE NATIONS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIGHT FOR THE BLIND INC: $14,000 · OtherLIGHT FOR THE BLIND INCADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS: $10,000 · OtherADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS+2 more: $4,500 · OtherInternational Christian Concern Inc: $57,000 · ReligionInternational Christian Concer…Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $19,000 · ReligionOpen Doors With Brother Andrew…INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION: $22,000 · InternationalINDIA NATION…GNBC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $7,000 · InternationalGNBC INTERNA…Window International Network: $2,000 · InternationalWindow Inter…INTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATI…CENTRAL UNION MISSION: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$147,500Religion$76,000International$31,000Human Services$23,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Christian Concern Inc: $57,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL UNION MISSION: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWindow International Network: $2,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Christian Concern Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIA NATIONAL INLAND MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds GNBC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL UNION MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Window International Network ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schnabel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schnabel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Schnabel Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Schnabel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schnabel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph