Skip to content
The Schauble Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Schauble Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$7.7MEnvironment$3.9MHuman Services$553kFood & Nutrition$151kRecreation & Sports$150kArts & Culture$105kPublic Benefit$105kScience & Tech$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CERES$1,019,029
HARVARD COLLEGE$500,000
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC$254,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH$62,500
US SOCCER FEDERATION$50,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MARIN ACADEMY$10,000
SPUR$10,000
MARIN ARGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST$10,000
TIPPING POINT FOUNDATION$5,000
SF MARIN FOOD BANK$5,000
MARIN SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $553k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $200k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $63k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALING: $60k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALING: $60k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $50k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA AND HEALING: $50k → 12%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $50k → 12%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 30 repeat orgs$602k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
13

Total granted

$13M
$602k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+40%

Still filing today

70%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CERES INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +65%
  • MA
    MARIN ACADEMY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +8%
  • TN
    The New School
    7× · 2017–2023 · $320k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • CC
    CERES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $300k
  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • KC
    KRIPALU CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc

Aura provides innovative, open resources to enable discovery and excellence in research, to unify the astrophysics communities, and to promote public understanding of our universe and the benefits of scientific exploration.

Science & Tech
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The Mount Auburn Preservation Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CERES: $3,017,250 · OtherCERESHARVARD COLLEGE: $2,297,818 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $550,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLADY MARGARET HALL (OXFORD): $497,418 · OtherLADY MARGARET HALL (OXFORD)CERES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Other+19 more: $632,111 · Other+19 moreCERES INC: $3,169,029 · EnvironmentCERES INCENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $275,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND IN…+3 more: $70,000 · EnvironmentMARIN ACADEMY: $1,010,000 · EducationMARIN ACADEMYThe New School: $320,000 · EducationThe New SchoolAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $279,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR O…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $100,000 · EducationPresident and F…+3 more: $100,000 · Education+3 moreKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $532,500 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $85,055 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $6,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMON SENSE MEDIA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureThe Mount Auburn Preservation Foundation Inc: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$7,294,597Environment$3,514,029Education$1,809,000Human Services$552,500Recreation & Sports$150,000Food & Nutrition$91,055Arts & Culture$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCERES INC: $3,169,029 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetMARIN ACADEMY: $1,010,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $532,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetThe New School: $320,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $279,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $275,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $105,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $85,055 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRARE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE MOVEMENT: $45,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mount Auburn Preservation Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetROOM TO READ: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CERES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds SPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds RARE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds COMMON SENSE MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds The Mount Auburn Preservation Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…The San Francisco Fou…Jewish Community Fede…The Bessemer Giving F…The Goldman Sachs Cha…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…ImpactassetsincNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
Marin Community FoundationCA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schauble Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schauble Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Vermont Natural Resources Council Inc: 30% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schauble Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home