Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schaap Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$193kHealth$152kEducation$137kHuman Services$97kInternational$41kYouth Development$4kAnimals$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MN ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE$25,488
SCHAEFFER ACADEMY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NUENA ESPERANZE$10,000
THE LANDING$8,000
DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL$8,000
WORTHINGTON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$5,000
UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
GUIDE YOUR HEART$4,000
CORNERSTONE CHURCH$3,000
MN ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE$2,500
YOUNG LIFE$2,100
DESTINY YOUTH RANCH$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL: $10k → 14%DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL: $8k → 14%DAYLIGHT CENTER & SCHOOL: $4k → 14%GUIDE YOUR HEART: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
IA
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
NM
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$632k · 16 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$632k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+40%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $152k · revenue +76%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    8× · 2018–2025 · $93k · revenue +182%
  • SU
    SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $78k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CV
    CAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • IC
    INTERMOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School (CCS) is committed to the academic, spiritual, physical, and social growth of our children in a Christ-centered environment. Continued on Schedule O Covenant Christian School cultivates a distinctive generation…

Education
2
Victory Christian Academy

Christian education victory christian academy exists to provide a christian education and team with parents to train and equip students to submit to the lordship of jesus christ in thought, word and deed.

3
Valor Christian High School in

To educate students in a biblical worldview, to high academic standards, with good character, as preparation to live victorious lives as christian adults.

Education
4
Christian Community School

As a support to evangelical christian families, the mission of christian community school is to provide an academically excellent, biblically integrated education which promotes christ-like character, preparing students to serve god and…

Education
5
Calvary Chapel School Inc

To educate children and to assist Christian families with their Biblical responsibilty to train according to Bible standards. In addition to Bible training, we exist to provide above grade level education offering increased achievement…

Education
6
Victory Christian Academy

The mission of victory christian academy, in partnership with christian parents, is to provide a loving, christ-centered environment of educational excellence so that the students may develop their gifts, knowledge, skills and energies to…

Education
7
Christian Schools Inc

Education - private christian school grades k-12

8
Camp Verde United Christian School

We want our students to know Jesus and be loved. UCS nutures each one to grow their faith and excel academically through Christ-centerd, Bible-based instruction.

Education
9
Christ Community School

Christ Community School strives to provide a superior education in a warm, caring atmosphere that will equip students to serve and lead in Christ.

10
Summit Classical Christian School

Summit Classical Christian School is a PreK-12 school that exists to cultivate generations of joyful disciples of Christ by partnering with faithful Christian families to educate their children from a Biblical worldview using classical…

Education
11
Northwest Christian School

The school functions as an extension of Christian Home supporting parents who seek to obey the biblical instruction which give them the ultimate responsibility for the education of their children. They offer a curiculum of Christian…

12
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School exist to partner with Christian parents in training their children: to provide quality Christ-centered academic education for children, and to actively promote service in the local church, community and nation.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Victory Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Daylight Center and School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHAEFFER ACADEMY — $59,500 · OtherSCHAEFFER ACADEMYSHEPHERDS STAFF — $50,000 · OtherSHEPHERDS STAFFTHE LANDING — $35,320 · OtherTHE LANDINGIndividual grant recipient — $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREAT COMMISSION UTAH — $14,000 · OtherGREAT COMMISSION UTAHWorthington Christian School Society — $11,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE CHURCH — $9,500 · Other+6 more — $16,000 · Other+6 moreMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $152,317 · HealthMinnesota Teen Challenge I…SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC — $78,000 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN UNIV…AMES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $16,000 · EducationAMES CHRISTIAN SC…UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · EducationJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $92,798 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRA…NUEVA ESPERANZA INC — $40,500 · Food & NutritionDAYLIGHT CENTER AND SCHOOL INC — $21,500 · Human ServicesGUIDE YOUR HEART — $4,000 · Human ServicesEQUIPNET — $10,000 · ReligionCAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Religion
Other$227,320Health$152,317Education$101,000Housing & Shelter$92,798Food & Nutrition$40,500Human Services$25,500Religion$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc — $152,317 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $92,798 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC — $78,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHAEFFER ACADEMY — $59,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNUEVA ESPERANZA INC — $40,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetDAYLIGHT CENTER AND SCHOOL INC — $21,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetAMES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $16,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetWorthington Christian School Society — $11,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEQUIPNET — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESTINY YOUTH RANCH INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds SCHAEFFER ACADEMY
  • Who funds NUEVA ESPERANZA INC
  • Who funds DAYLIGHT CENTER AND SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds AMES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds GREAT COMMISSION UTAH
  • Who funds Worthington Christian School Society
  • Who funds EQUIPNET
  • Who funds CAMP VICTORY MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds UNITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds GUIDE YOUR HEART
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds DESTINY YOUTH RANCH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schaap Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph