Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Samuel Lyon Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$234kEmployment$69kHealth$67kEducation$60kPhilanthropy$52kHuman Services$47kInternational$25kCivil Rights$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$1,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENESETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$18,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES$11,000
THE TEMPLE$8,500
NORTHWESTERN ANNUAL FUND$5,000
HOME OF THE INNOCENTS$5,000
MEREDITH-DUNN LEARNING CENTER INC$5,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$2,500
MT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$2,000
MERCY ACADEMY$2,000
LOUISVILLE OLMSTEAD PARKS CONSERVAN$1,500
KIDS CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC THERAPIES$1,500
WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN$1,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,250
HADASSAH$1,250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-KY$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAY SPRING: $500 → 15%DAY SPRING: $500 → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $4k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $4k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $4k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $4k → 15%HOSPARUS: $1k → 15%HOSPARUS: $1k → 15%HOSPARUS: $1k → 15%HOSPARUS: $1k → 15%HOSPARUS: $750 → 15%HOSPARUS: $500 → 15%HOSPARUS: $500 → 15%HOSPARUS: $500 → 15%HOSPARUS: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
KY
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$540k · 34 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
14

Total granted

$540k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+51%

Still filing today

47%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +201%
  • LO
    LOUISVILLE OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY IN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +156%
  • CP
    Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOUISVILLE
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy Inc

To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.

Public Benefit
3
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Kentucky Pediatric Society

To promote the health and welfare of all infants, children, and adolescents.

—
6
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
9
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
10
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENESETH ISRAEL: $118,250 · OtherKENESETH ISRAELTHE TEMPLE CONGREGATION ADATH ISREAL B RITH SHOLOM INC: $80,000 · OtherTHE TEMPLE CONGREGATION ADATH ISREAL B RITH SHOLOM INCJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $69,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICESMEREDITH-DUNN SCHOOL INC: $48,000 · OtherMEREDITH-DUNN SCHOOL INCNORTHWESTERN ANNUAL FUND: $28,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN ANNUAL FUNDISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND: $22,500 · Other+31 more: $120,850 · Other+31 moreTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME …HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $7,250 · Human ServicesHOSPARUS …+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc: $10,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $8,750 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,250 · HealthPOWER FOR PARKINSONS: $1,400 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN LOUISVILLE SECTION: $5,500 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,500 · Community ImprovementKentucky Chamber Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Community ImprovementKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $7,750 · AnimalsHARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $4,000 · Civil Rights
Other$486,600Human Services$49,250Health$25,900Philanthropy$10,500Community Improvement$8,000Animals$7,750Civil Rights$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEREDITH-DUNN SCHOOL INC: $48,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISVILLE OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY IN: $10,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc: $10,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $8,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $7,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $7,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN LOUISVILLE SECTION: $5,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIO: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER FOR PARKINSONS: $1,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKentucky Chamber Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAY SPRING INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY DANCE COUNCIL INC DBA LOUISVILLE BALLET: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEREDITH-DUNN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE OLMSTED PARKS CONSERVANCY IN ↗
  • Who funds Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WHAS CRUSADE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN LOUISVILLE SECTION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds VISUALLY IMPARIED PRESCHOOL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds HONEYMOON ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds POWER FOR PARKINSONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Republic Bank Foundation IncKY34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Irvin F & Alice S Etscorn Charitable Foundation · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Legacy Foundation of Kentuckiana Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Samuel Lyon Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Samuel Lyon Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Samuel Lyon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph