· Private foundation
The Samuel Ernest Douglass Jr Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Penland School of Craft | $3,627 |
| Legal Aid of North Carolina | $2,725 |
| FoodFinder | $2,700 |
| Habitat for Humanity | $2,591 |
| Lower Cape Fear Hospice | $2,591 |
| WARM NC | $2,588 |
| Meals on Wheels America | $2,588 |
| Democracy Forward Foundation | $2,587 |
| Campaign for Southern Equality | $2,583 |
| The Food Bank of Central & Eastern NC | $2,582 |
| The Barnabas Network | $2,577 |
| Carousel Center Child Advocacy | $2,575 |
| Eden Village of Wilmington | $2,575 |
| Domestic Violence Shelter & Service | $2,551 |
| Good Shepherd Center | $2,551 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +87%
- LCLower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare7× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +27%
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS COUNCIL INC7× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- UFUNITED FOR PUERTO RICOone grant, 2017 · $5k
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +34%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.
New Disabled South Rising is the advocacy arm of New Disabled South focusing on poverty and care, criminalization and democracy.
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.
USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.
To improve the lives of disabled people and build strong disability justice and rights movements in the South through research & knowledge building, advocacy & policy change, non-partisan voter engagement, and coalition building.
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.
Social welfare advocacy organization
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America and the most unlike its peers is George Floyd Global Memorial. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc ↗
- Who funds Lower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Domestic Violence Shelter and Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Eden Village of Wilmington ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Wilmington Area Rebuilding Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BARNABAS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds The Carousel Center Inc ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Full Belly Project LTD ↗
- Who funds Friends of Public Radio DBA WHQR ↗
- Who funds Surfers Healing Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NourishNC Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW HANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BE THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Penland School Of Craft ↗
- Who funds Bahamas National Trust Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Campaign For Southern Equality ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS ↗
- Who funds THE DESCENDANTS PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · The Landfall Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The True North Foundation Co Amy Brown North · Cape Fear Memorial Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc · The Lagomarsino Foundation · The Myrtle and Rt Sinclair Jr Charitable Foundation Inc · The Rudisill Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Samuel Ernest Douglass Jr Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.