Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Saleh Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$124kHealth$13kCivil Rights$12kHuman Services$11kInternational$8kSocial Science$6kArts & Culture$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$1,300
Median grant
5
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,100
UMMA$10,000
FASEELAH$3,300
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,305
AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHT COUNCEL AHRC$1,300
THE FURQAN PROJECT$1,040
GUIDANCE COLLEGE$1,000
ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION$828
BASMA$160
BAITUL MAAL$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 44% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%GUIDANCE COLLEGE: $1k → 16%NON VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 14%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $15k → 8%DARUL ULOOM-DETROIT: $1k → 10%FLINT ISLAMIC CENTER: $32k → 16%AL-QURAN ACADEMY OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 21%PALESTINE CHILDREN RELIEF FUND: $2k → 12%FURQAAN INSTITUTE: $2k → 7%THE FURQAN PROJECT: $1k → 7%REACH EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 14%SAWASIA: $24k → 12%DROPLETS OF MERCY: $2k → 6%UMMA: $10k → 8%PALESTINE CHILDERN RELIEF BANK: $2k → 12%FURQAAN INSTITUTE: $2k → 7%SAWASIA: $16k → 12%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $10k → 8%AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: $3k → 21%PALESTINE CHILDREN RELIEF FUND: $1k → 12%FURQAAN INSTITUTE: $2k → 7%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $8k → 8%AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: $2k → 21%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $8k → 8%AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: $2k → 21%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $6k → 8%AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHT COUNCEL AHRC: $1k → 21%UNITED MI MUSLIM ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: $1k → 21%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $5k → 8%AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: $1k → 21%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $3k → 8%AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: $1k → 21%UMMA: $2k → 8%DARUL WAHI: $3k → 21%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $2k → 8%RAHMA RELIEF FDN: $2k → 8%THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $1k → 21%TAWHEED: $1k → 8%NAA MA: $1k → 8%MUSLIM UNITY CTR: $3k → 8%MUSLIM UNITY CTR: $2k → 8%MUSLIM UNITY CTR: $1k → 8%MUSLIM UNITY CTR: $1k → 8%ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $8k → 8%ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $6k → 8%ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 8%ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $1k → 8%CAIR: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
IL
MI
OH
NJ
VA
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$178k · 10 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +193% since the first grant, against +71% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
26

Total granted

$178k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+193%
+71%

Still filing today

40%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +193%
  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +650%
  • TQ
    THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    2× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • FI
    FLINT ISLAMIC CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • S
    SAMS
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • UM
    UNITED MI MUSLIM ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
3
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
4
Al-Zaharah Islamic Education Center
5
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
6
Ibrahim Center

Provide religious education, space and mentorship.

Religion
7
Hamzah Islamic Center Inc

Practice and education of Islam

Religion
8
Tajweed Institute Inc

Non-profitspecializing in the magnificence of the qurraan with regards to itsmemorization, recitation, and perfection of the proper rules of of tajweed.

Education
9
Dawat-E-Islami Wa

To propagate the teachings of the holy quran and the sunnah of the holy and nobel prophet, prophet muhammad (peace & blessings be upon him) including, without limitation, to organize educational and prayer sessions for the teaching of the…

Religion
10
Rahmat-E-Alam Foundation

The mission of rahmat-e-alam is to enlighten humanity with the authentic knowledge of islam.

Religion
11
Itqaan Institute

An educational organization providing premier educational services to those who cannot afford it, as well as general charitable services

Education
12
Cambodian Islamic Foundation
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muslim Legal Fund of America and the most unlike its peers is Darul Wahi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $58,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAWASIA — $40,000 · OtherSAWASIAFLINT ISLAMIC CENTER — $32,000 · OtherFLINT ISLAMIC CENTERFASEELAH — $20,300 · OtherFASEELAHUMMA — $12,412 · OtherUMMASAMS — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,890 · Other+24 more — $33,130 · Other+24 moreISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION — $18,341 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL INC — $9,500 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $3,040 · InternationalTHE FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE AND DEVELOPMENT — $500 · International+1 more — $100 · InternationalTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $1,200 · EducationREACH EDUCATION FUND — $1,000 · EducationGUIDANCE COLLEGE INC — $1,000 · EducationJAMIA ISLAMIA DARUL-ULOOM DETROIT — $200 · EducationDarul Wahi — $3,000 · ReligionMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA — $250 · Civil Rights
Other$215,832Arts & Culture$18,341International$13,140Education$3,400Religion$3,000Civil Rights$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION — $18,341 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL INC — $9,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $3,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACH EDUCATION FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE AND DEVELOPMENT — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMIA ISLAMIA DARUL-ULOOM DETROIT — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
  • Who funds Darul Wahi
  • Who funds THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
  • Who funds NON-VIOLENCE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds REACH EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds GUIDANCE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE AND DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA
  • Who funds JAMIA ISLAMIA DARUL-ULOOM DETROIT
  • Who funds BAITULMAAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kadry FoundationMI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kadry Foundation · The Bitar Foundatiuon · The Arif Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · Issa Foundation · The Farhan Foundation · The Kashlan Foundation · The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Saleh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Saleh Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Saleh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph