Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bitar Foundatiuon

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$56kInternational$42kArts & Culture$26kHuman Services$17kHealth$16kPhilanthropy$11kCivil Rights$7kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$483k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,550
ISLAMIC RELIEF$3,250
MED GLOBAL$3,000
GUIDANCE COLLEGE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,320
UMMA$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HELPING HAND: $7k → 8%HELPING HAND: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
VA
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$159k · 16 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
27

Total granted

$159k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+148%

Still filing today

50%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalCivil RightsHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    Women for Humanity
    5× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +35%
  • HH
    HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +5%
  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    3× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITED CHARITY
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • RW
    RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +148%
  • L
    LIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
2
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Muslim Response Usa for Relief and Development

To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…

International
4
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
5
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
6
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
7
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
8
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture
9
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
10
Al-Zaharah Islamic Education Center
11
Darul Quran Academy Inc

Friday jumah salah, hifz school. weekend qural class, daily five time salah.

Human Services
12
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hand for Relief and Development Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSLIM UNTIY CENTER — $35,900 · OtherMUSLIM UNTIY CENTERICA — $23,950 · OtherICASARN — $15,700 · OtherSARNIndividual grant recipient — $11,048 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED CHARITY — $9,000 · OtherUNITED CHARITYUMMA — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,800 · Other+24 more — $37,161 · Other+24 moreWomen for Humanity — $13,160 · InternationalWomen for HumanityISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $11,238 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USARAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT — $7,607 · InternationalRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID…PURE HANDS INC — $5,105 · InternationalPURE HANDS INCHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $11,410 · Human ServicesTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $3,000 · EducationHUDA SCHOOL — $3,000 · EducationGUIDANCE COLLEGE INC — $2,500 · EducationTHE QURAN LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,700 · EducationJAMIA ISLAMIA DARUL-ULOOM DETROIT — $500 · EducationCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $7,195 · Civil RightsMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA — $2,500 · Civil RightsMedGlobal Inc — $3,000 · HealthISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$143,559International$37,110Human Services$11,410Education$10,700Civil Rights$9,695Health$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWomen for Humanity — $13,160 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $11,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $11,238 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT — $7,607 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $7,195 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPURE HANDS INC — $5,105 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMedGlobal Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUDA SCHOOL — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDANCE COLLEGE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Mission For Relief & Development — $2,280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASJID AT-TAQWA — $541 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJAMIA ISLAMIA DARUL-ULOOM DETROIT — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Women for Humanity
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
  • Who funds RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC
  • Who funds MedGlobal Inc
  • Who funds ISLAMIC CULTURAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE QURAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
  • Who funds HUDA SCHOOL
  • Who funds GUIDANCE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds MUSLIM LEGAL FUND OF AMERICA
  • Who funds United Mission For Relief & Development
  • Who funds THE QURAN LEARNING CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fountain of Knowledg FoundationMI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · The Kashlan Foundation · Sattar Family Foundation · The Dana-Z Foundation · The Saleh Foundation · The Kadry Foundation · The Straight Path Foundation · Dr Nussri Foundation · The Symn Foundation · Dearborn Community Center · The Syed Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bitar Foundatiuon funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph