Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Saleh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$177kFood & Nutrition$96kHealth$86kHuman Services$68kAnimals$53kEducation$42kHousing & Shelter$38kInternational$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS$20,000
EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$15,000
HIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION$10,000
ST ATHANASIUS CHURCH$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$5,000
TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
ORGANIC SOUP KITCHEN$5,000
THERAPET FOUNDATION$2,500
GREYHOUNDS UNLIMITED$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 12%EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 12%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CA
VA
AR
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$604k · 41 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
2

Total granted

$604k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+228%

Still filing today

37%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SUBIACO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $35k · revenue +8%
  • H8
    HIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +51%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF THE LITTLE FLOWER
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TP
    TYLER POLICE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +228%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Rescue Inc
Animals
2
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
3
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
4
Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc

Food distribution to the hungry throughout an eight county service territory in Southeast Texas.

Human Services
5
Catholic Charities- Diocese of Tyler

Catholic charities-diocese of tyler is a servant of the body of christ engaged in works of mercy to ease suffering of the poor, the hungry, the naked, the sick, the homeless, the immigrant, the least amoung us, our brethren in east texas.…

Philanthropy
6
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

7
Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

Animals
8
South Texas Food Bank

To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…

Community Improvement
9
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
10
Texas Palliative Care

Texas palliative care operates to strengthen and further the goals and purpose of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.

Health
11
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

12
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nicholas Pet Haven. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $68,000 · OtherEAST TEXAS FOOD BANKST ATHANASIUS CHURCH — $45,000 · OtherST ATHANASIUS CHURCHUNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER TY — $35,000 · OtherUNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER TYTHERAPET FOUNDATION — $31,500 · OtherTHERAPET FOUNDATIONHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION — $31,000 · OtherHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSIONHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS — $30,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF EAST TEXASChristus Foundation — $30,000 · OtherChristus FoundationTRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherTRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATIONCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA — $26,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USACATHEDRAL OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPT — $20,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER - — $20,000 · OtherGREYHOUNDS UNLIMITED — $16,500 · Other+19 more — $77,010 · Other+19 moreSUBIACO FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationSUBIACO FO…TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationTYLER JUNI…Mercy Ships International — $30,000 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $7,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $6,000 · InternationalMEALS ON WHEELS — $11,060 · Human ServicesST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $9,000 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesORGANIC SOUP KITCHEN — $10,000 · Food & NutritionHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $7,000 · Housing & ShelterTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthNICHOLAS PET HAVEN — $2,500 · AnimalsSPCA OF EAST TEXAS INC — $1,000 · Animals
Other$460,010Education$55,000International$43,000Human Services$27,060Food & Nutrition$10,000Housing & Shelter$7,000Health$5,000Animals$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUBIACO FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION — $31,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS — $30,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $11,060 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetORGANIC SOUP KITCHEN — $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNICHOLAS PET HAVEN — $2,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA OF EAST TEXAS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTYLER POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUBIACO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds ORGANIC SOUP KITCHEN
  • Who funds ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Smith County
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NICHOLAS PET HAVEN
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

A S Genecov FoundationTX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: A S Genecov Foundation · Hibbs Family Foundation · James I Perkins Family Foundation · Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · Bob L Herd Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation · Anderson-Vukelja Foundation · Byers Family Foundation · Riter Family Foundation · The Rogers Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Saleh Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph