Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Saint Anthony - Cibus Corpus Domus Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$374kInternational$104kPhilanthropy$85kEducation$64kFood & Nutrition$48kHuman Services$46kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $114k
$12,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS UNDER 5000$44,700
ST BONIFACE CHURCH$25,000
ST MARY CHURCH$22,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$12,300
LEHMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
BETHANY CENTERWILMA'S PLACE$8,000
ST ANTHONY HAITI MINISTRY$5,130
MIAMI COUNTY YMCA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$783k · 10 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$783k
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-23%
+99%

Still filing today

20%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VARIOUS UNDER 5000
    8× · 2018–2025 · $196k
  • SM
    ST MARY CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $169k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2018–2023 · $105k

Funded once

  • DG
    DO GOOD IN HIS NAME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +99%
  • VU
    VARIOUS UNER 5000
    one grant, 2017 · $47k
  • LC
    LEHMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS UNDER 5000: $196,146 · OtherVARIOUS UNDER 5000ST MARY CHURCH: $168,857 · OtherST MARY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST ANTHONY HAITI MINISTRY: $98,630 · OtherST ANTHONY HAITI MINISTRYST JOHN INSTITUTE: $68,000 · OtherST JOHN INSTITUTELEHMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $52,000 · OtherLEHMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLVARIOUS UNER 5000: $47,400 · OtherVARIOUS UNER 5000+7 more: $94,000 · Other+7 moreDO GOOD IN HIS NAME INC: $100,000 · ReligionDO GOOD IN …LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $6,000 · ReligionLEELANAU CH…PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $42,300 · InternationalMiami County YMCA: $20,000 · Human ServicesBETHANY CENTER: $5,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$830,033Religion$106,000Philanthropy$70,000International$42,300Human Services$20,000Food & Nutrition$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDO GOOD IN HIS NAME INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetPIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $42,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMiami County YMCA: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBETHANY CENTER: $5,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DO GOOD IN HIS NAME INC ↗
  • Who funds PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Saint Anthony - Cibus Corpus Domus Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Saint Anthony - Cibus Corpus Domus Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saint Anthony - Cibus Corpus Domus’ filings →

More from the funding graph