Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sack Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$57kEducation$14kHealth$11kArts & Culture$9kPhilanthropy$8kRecreation & Sports$6kCivil Rights$4kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYSTIC SEAPORT$1,863
PARMALEE FARMS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HELPING HANDS$1,000
MEIGS POINT NATURE CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARTFORD ARTISANS WEAVING CENTER: $25 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
TN
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 18 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +78% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$105k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+78%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +49%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +115%
  • MJ
    MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HAVEN JEWISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF NEW HAVEN
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
4
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
5
Middlesex Hospital

Middlesex hospital exists to provide the safest, highest-quality health care and the best experience possible for our community. (continued on schedule o)

Health
6
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
7
Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc

The mission of the Jupiter Medical Center Foundation, Inc. is to secure the financial resources required to sustain clinical excellence and quality of care at Jupiter Medical Center, Inc. & its affiliates.

Philanthropy
8
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
11
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
12
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mystic Seaport Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BETH TIKVAH: $56,628 · OtherTEMPLE BETH TIKVAHWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY: $14,100 · OtherWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMYFRENCHMAN'S CREEK CHARITY: $6,075 · OtherFRENCHMAN'S CREEK CHARITY+17 more: $14,455 · Other+17 moreJupiter Medical Center Inc: $7,600 · HealthJupiter Me…MADISON AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC DBA MADISON EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $1,500 · HealthMADISON AM…THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $750 · HealthTHE SCRIPP…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $450 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $6,438 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,863 · Arts & CultureMADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $550 · Arts & CultureCAMP LAURELWOOD INC: $5,900 · Recreation & SportsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100 · Civil RightsHARTFORD ARTISANS WEAVING CENTER INC: $25 · Human Services
Other$91,258Health$10,350Arts & Culture$8,851Recreation & Sports$5,900Civil Rights$100Human Services$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY: $14,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $7,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $6,438 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP LAURELWOOD INC: $5,900 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $1,863 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC DBA MADISON EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $550 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD ARTISANS WEAVING CENTER INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP LAURELWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION INC DBA MADISON EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MADISON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD ARTISANS WEAVING CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sack Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sack Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Hartford Artisans Weaving Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wilbraham and Monson Academy: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sack’s filings →

More from the funding graph