Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ruth L Lee Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$361kCrime & Legal$280kHousing & Shelter$280kCivil Rights$25kScience & Tech$12kHuman Services$8kArts & Culture$6kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS$40,000
SMITH CAMPUS SCHOOL$39,825
UNCOMMON LAW$15,000
EMBODIMENT INSTITUTE$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BECAUSE BLACK IS STILL BEAUTIFUL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BEAM$2,500
CHILDREN INC$1,140
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW$1,000
WGBH$500
Individual grant recipient$500
ZERO TO THREE$250
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BECAUSE BLACK IS STILL BEAUTIFUL: $3k → 12%CHILDREN INC: $1k → 13%FAMILY FOCUS: $500 → 14%BECAUSE BLACK IS STILL BEAUTIFUL: $3k → 12%ZERO TO THREE: $500 → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $500 → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $500 → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
CA
MD
NC
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$873k · 12 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$873k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

58%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UL
    UNCOMMON LAW
    9× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue ×24
  • ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +153%
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $149k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SC
    SMITH COLLEGE JUNIOR YEAR ABORD
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • SC
    SMITH COLLEGE JUNIOR YEAR ABROAD
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • SC
    SMITH COLLEGE CAMPUS FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $37k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
2
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Wgbh Educational Foundation

WGBH enriches people's lives through programs and services that educate, inspire, and entertain, fostering citizenship and culture, the joy of learning, and the power of diverse perspectives.

Arts & Culture
5
Boston Impact Initiative Fund

Form 990 - organization's mission or most significant activitiesboston impact initiative (bii) is a nonprofit impact investment fund and certified community development financial institution (cdfi). bii provides small businesses,…

Community Improvement
6
Edvestors Inc

Edvestors was founded in 2002 as a platform to connect boston philanthropists with the city's public schools by identifying, shaping, and matching donors with promising school improvement efforts. (see schedule o)

Education
7
The Brookings Institution

The brookings institution (brookings) is a nonprofit public policy organization that conducts in-depth, independent research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national, and global level.…

Social Science
8
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
9
Sesame Workshop

Sesame workshop's mission is to help kids grow smarter, stronger and kinder. (see schedule o)

Arts & Culture
10
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
11
United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc

To advance an economically just region where prosperity is shared across race and ethnicity.

Philanthropy
12
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Enterprise Community Partners Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNCOMMON LAW — $280,000 · Crime & LegalUNCOMMON LAWSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INCENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $280,000 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS …SMITH CAMPUS SCHOOL — $78,117 · OtherSMITH CAMPUS SCHOOLSMITH COLLEGE JUNIOR YEAR ABORD — $40,191 · OtherSMITH COLLEGE JUNIOR YEAR ABO…SMITH COLLEGE JUNIOR YEAR ABROAD — $40,000 · OtherSMITH COLLEGE JUNIOR YEAR ABR…SMITH COLLEGE CAMPUS FUND — $36,820 · OtherSMITH COLLEGE CAMPUS FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSMITH COLLEGE (LAB SCH) — $12,000 · Other+21 more — $31,290 · Other+21 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $148,634 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF TH…EMBODIMENT INSTITUTE INCORPORATED — $17,500 · EducationEMBODIMENT INSTITU…BECAUSE BLACK IS STILL BEAUTIFUL — $5,000 · Human ServicesZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $1,750 · Human ServicesCHILDREN INC — $1,140 · Human ServicesFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY — $500 · Human ServicesBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Arts & CultureSQUASHBUSTERS INC — $4,000 · Youth Development
Crime & Legal$305,000Community Improvement$280,000Other$268,418Education$166,134Human Services$8,390Arts & Culture$6,000Youth Development$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNCOMMON LAW — $280,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $280,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $148,634 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $25,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEMBODIMENT INSTITUTE INCORPORATED — $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECAUSE BLACK IS STILL BEAUTIFUL — $5,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSQUASHBUSTERS INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNCOMMON LAW
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds EMBODIMENT INSTITUTE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds BECAUSE BLACK IS STILL BEAUTIFUL
  • Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC
  • Who funds ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES
  • Who funds CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds Boston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ruth L Lee Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc22% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ruth L Lee Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Ruth L Lee Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph