· Private foundation
The Ruth Krauss Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k47 grants · $138k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHOKE JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $12,000 |
| CONNECTICUT FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| MARRAKECH INC | $9,000 |
| STOCKBRIDGE LIBRARY | $9,000 |
| PROJECT MORRY | $6,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE | $5,500 |
| MASS AUDUBON | $5,000 |
| PEOPLE'S PANTRY | $5,000 |
| BERKSHIRE BOUNTY | $5,000 |
| CONNECTICUT LEGAL SERVICES | $5,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS | $5,000 |
| MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $4,500 |
| BERKSHIRE GROWN | $4,000 |
| OPERATION HOPE | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -43% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +46%
- CFCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +97%
- CLCONNECTICUT LEGAL SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- BCBERKSHIRE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (18 DEGREES)one grant, 2019 · $3k
- EWEDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INCone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -60%
- TCTHE CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PITTSFIELDone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements
The organization provides child care services to families through child care centers and a network of family child care homes. child care of the berkshires also strengthens families through support services and home visiting focused on…
The purpose and mission of community counseling of bristol county, inc. (ccbc) is to develop and deliver compassionate, responsive, culturally competent, and quality mental health and substance abuse services to meet the…
To foster community partnerships, promote individual advocacy and create a pathway for growth and innovation by offering exceptional support and services to people with all abilities through the attraction, development and retention of…
Connections work changes lives and improves communities by providing services and supports to individuals seeking pathways to success.
To provide policy guidance, selection and oversight and to organize programs for the purpose of work force development in berkshire county, massachusetts.
To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.
Children's services
Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.
We work to ensure that individuals with disabilities can live independently as equal members of society.
Our mission is to mobilize people, partnerships and resources to catalyze change that strengthens the communities served.
The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifebridge Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Peoples Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF STAMFORD INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MARRAKECH INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE GROWN INC ↗
- Who funds ROOTS RISING INC ↗
- Who funds 18 DEGREES INC ↗
- Who funds GREENAGERS INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOPE OF FAIRFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds RAILROAD STREET YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE MUSIC SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE GARDEN CENTER INC DBA BERKSHIRE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds Literacy Network of South Berkshire Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE KENNEDY COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLES PANTRY ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds The Norwalk Symphony Society Inc ↗
- Who funds CLASP HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation · Berkshire United Way Inc · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · The Buchwald Family Foundation · The Near and Far Association Inc · Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ruth Krauss Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Clasp Homes Inc — 91% of income from government
- The Kennedy Collective Inc — 79% of income from government
- 18 Degrees Inc — 60% of income from government
- Saint Joseph Parenting Center Inc — 51% of income from government
- The Center for Family Justice Inc — 49% of income from government
- Clicc Inc — 46% of income from government
- Railroad Street Youth Project Inc — 45% of income from government
- Lifebridge Community Services Inc — 32% of income from government
- Berkshire Grown Inc — 28% of income from government
- Liberation Programs Inc — 24% of income from government
- Connecticut Legal Services Inc — 18% of income from government
- Operation Hope of Fairfield Inc — 15% of income from government
- Marrakech Inc — 14% of income from government
- The Norwalk Symphony Society Inc — 13% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Crisis Center — 10% of income from government
- The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
- Roots Rising Inc — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc — 4% of income from government
- Jewish Family Service of Stamford Inc — 2% of income from government
- Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc — 2% of income from government
- Connecticut Ballet Inc — 2% of income from government
- Edith Wharton Restoration Inc — 1% of income from government
- Norman Rockwell Museum at Stockbridge Inc — 1% of income from government
- Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ruth Krauss Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Ruth Krauss Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.