Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ruth Angeline Whitley Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$42kHealth$28kArts & Culture$15kEnvironment$5kHuman Services$4kOther$46k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$98k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bobby Nichols-Fiddlesticks Foundati$7,500
Jewish Education in Media Inc$5,000
A Bridge to a Cure Foundation Inc$5,000
Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc$2,000
Compassonate Care$2,000
Circle Program$2,000
Collaboratory$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc: $2k → 9%Interlakes Community Caregivers Inc: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$127k · 10 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$127k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+2619%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    BOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +33%
  • BT
    BRIDGE TO A CURE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +77%
  • JE
    JEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • LK
    LAKE KANASATKA WATERSHED ASSOCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue ×27 · 26% of their budget
  • LM
    LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Shore Jewish Press Ltd

The mission of the jewish journal is to educate, inform, engage and connect the jewish community north of boston and beyond.

2
Jewish Federation of Broome County Inc

To improve the quality of jewish life in the southern tier of new york state and to promote jewish identity and welfare, in israel and throughout the world.

Philanthropy
3
North Florida Botanical Society Inc

To establish, develop and maintain a botanical garden that celebrates the immense beauty and diversity of the earths flora.

Environment
4
Symbioseas

Marine research

Science & Tech
5
The North Suburban Jewish Community Center Inc

The north suburban jewish community center develops and implements programs for the recreational, educational, cultural, physical and social needs of infants to seniors for the jewish and general north shore community.

6
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
7
Jcc Rockland Inc

JCC Rockland is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the enrichment and continuity of Jewish life and to the preservation of Jewish heritage.

Human Services
8
Jewish Community of Greater Stowe

Provide religious, educational and community services to the congregation and additional persons in the community.

Religion
9
Seashore Gardens Foundation

The mission of seashore gardens foundation is to provide aid and support for the health care programs and supportive services provided on the atlas at seashore gardens campus.

Health
10
Breslov Florida Inc

Breslov Florida serves the South Florida Jewish Community with an outreach center that provides classes and programs, which are open to the public. Our center seeks to further the teachings of Reb Nachman from Breslov.

Human Services
11
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
12
North Shore Mikvah Association

To furnish a ritual bath (mikvah) for religious jewish women, as tradition dictates. to emerse themselves seven days after completion of their menstrual cycle.prior to having relations with their husbands.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Greenwich Jewish Study Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CIRCLE PROGRAM — $13,000 · OtherCIRCLE PROGRAMThe Greenwich Jewish Study Group Inc — $10,000 · OtherThe Greenwich Jewish Study Group IncCommunity Caregivers — $9,000 · OtherCommunity CaregiversCompassonate Care — $4,000 · OtherCompassonate CareSW Fl Community Fd — $4,000 · OtherSW Fl Community FdIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · OtherLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION…BOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUNDATION INC — $37,250 · PhilanthropyBOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUN…SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · PhilanthropySOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUND…BRIDGE TO A CURE FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 · HealthBRIDGE TO A CURE FOUND…JEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE — $15,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH EDUCA…LAKE KANASATKA WATERSHED ASSOC — $5,000 · EnvironmentInterlakes Community Caregivers Inc — $4,000 · Human Services
Other$45,500Philanthropy$41,750Health$28,000Arts & Culture$15,000Environment$5,000Human Services$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOBBY NICHOLS - FIDDLESTICKS FOUNDATION INC — $37,250 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBRIDGE TO A CURE FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCIRCLE PROGRAM — $13,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetThe Greenwich Jewish Study Group Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetLAKE KANASATKA WATERSHED ASSOC — $5,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInterlakes Community Caregivers Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ruth Angeline Whitley Memorial Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 69%
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc69% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ruth Angeline Whitley Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Ruth Angeline Whitley Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph