Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rudolph and Marie Simich Family

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$199kYouth Development$140kHuman Services$24kRecreation & Sports$16kCrime & Legal$12kEducation$9kInternational$8kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$670k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAN BEARD COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$20,000
LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES$15,000
CINCINNATII CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION$5,000
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative$5,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$5,000
CET$3,000
BACK2BACK MINISTRIES$2,000
VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR THE POOR$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $2k → 16%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$393k · 12 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$393k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+43%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • LY
    LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES
    4× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +49%
  • MW
    MAY WE HELP INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $33k · revenue +446%

Funded once

  • D
    DSAGC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TC
    The Care Center
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • MN
    Mercy Neighborhood Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
4
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
11
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
12
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse Youth Services; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD: $99,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARDCINCINNATII CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $55,000 · OtherCINCINNATII CHILDREN'S HOSPITALRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $22,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESCET: $19,500 · OtherCETVOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR THE POOR: $12,000 · OtherDSAGC: $10,000 · OtherThe Care Center: $8,000 · Other+4 more: $7,855 · OtherBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $45,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATIONMAY WE HELP INC: $33,000 · HealthMAY WE HELP INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncMercy Neighborhood Ministries Inc: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $2,000 · HealthLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $35,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE…CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $4,000 · Human ServicesCANCER SUP…Back 2 Back Ministries Inc: $8,000 · ReligionCincinnati Youth Collaborative: $5,000 · Education
Other$233,855Health$145,000Human Services$39,000Religion$8,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD: $99,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC: $33,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBack 2 Back Ministries Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Neighborhood Ministries Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCincinnati Youth Collaborative: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIMPACT AUTISM FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DRAGONFLY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MAY WE HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Back 2 Back Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Neighborhood Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT AUTISM FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Maxwell C Weaver Foundation · Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1 · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rudolph and Marie Simich Family funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rudolph and Marie Simich Family. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rudolph and Marie Simich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph