· Private foundation
The Rubinstein Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STANDWITHUS | $25,000 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (EIN 13-1659627) | $15,000 |
| ISRAEL TENNIS & EDUCATION CENTERS FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| HEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC | $10,000 |
| AMERICA GIVES INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,768 |
| MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $5,320 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL | $3,280 |
| SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN FILM FESTIVAL | $2,000 |
| MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM | $1,951 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND | $1,853 |
| KOSHER TROOPS | $1,500 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND | $1,302 |
| HADASSAH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CHABADORG | $400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IEISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE7× · 2017–2024 · $128k · revenue +122%
- IFISRAFEST FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2023 · $87k · revenue +61%
- ITISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $19k
- CKCONGREGATION KOZOVER ZICHRON CHAIM SHLOIMEone grant, 2022 · $18k
- AAAmerican Associates of the Haifa Foundationone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.
The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hadassah Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Faces of Tomorrow. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOMEN'S INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MACCABI WORLD UNION INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAFEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds LARGER THAN LIFE USA INC ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
- Who funds MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds American Associates of the Haifa Foundation ↗
- Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
- Who funds Faces of Tomorrow ↗
- Who funds HEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
- Who funds ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SEPHARDIC EDUCATIONAL & CULTURAL CENTER IN JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Annenberg Foundation · Gold Family Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Englanoff Family Foundation · Los Angeles Jewish Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rubinstein Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.