Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
IRANIAN JEWISH WOMENS ORGANIZATION (California) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $24,300 in grants to it, the largest being Y&S Nazarian Family Foundation ($12,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
IRANIAN JEWISH WOMENS ORGANIZATION has grown faster than half of the 2,868 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,868 international nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $300 → $15k.
From the IRS filings of IRANIAN JEWISH WOMENS ORGANIZATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
IRANIAN JEWISH WOMENS ORGANIZATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2022 71% · 2023 67% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
IRANIAN JEWISH WOMENS ORGANIZATION is locally rooted: 71% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 136 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing