Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roy and Ana Zellars Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Human Services$221kHousing & Shelter$18kReligion$15kHealth$9kAnimals$8kInternational$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$500
DRY BONES DENVER$500
Individual grant recipient$500
SAINT TIMOTHY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$500
FACT RELIEF FOUNDATION$500
FINMANGO$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $208k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KINDNESSORG: $1k → 20%FINMANGO: $4k → 13%KINDNESSORG: $1k → 20%FINMANGO: $2k → 13%FINMANGO: $500 → 13%DENVER RESUE MISSION: $100k → 12%FINMANGO: $100 → 13%DENVER RESUE MISSION: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
OH
NJ
CA
UT
CO
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of The Roy and Ana Zellars Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 83% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 68%.

The Roy and Ana Zellars Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 30% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 11 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
28

Total granted

$264k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+82%

Still filing today

36%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DR
    DENVER RESCUE MISSION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +57%
  • DB
    DRY BONES DENVER
    3× · 2018–2021 · $13k · revenue +74%
  • CR
    CAVALIER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +472%

Funded once

  • AR
    ACTS RESOURCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • H1
    HOUSING 180
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Witness Inc

Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. witness is working towards a world where the communities we center, serve, and support can safely and effectively use video and technology to end human…

International
2
World Without Orphans Global

World without orphans (wwo) global's vision is that every child would grow up in a safe and loving family, know their heavenly father, and reach their god-given purpose. wwo global's mission is to call and equip national leaders to…

International
3
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
4
One Days Wages

One Day's Wages is a movement of people, stories, and actions to alleviate extreme global poverty. One Day's Wages promotes awareness, invites giving, and supports sustainable relief through partnerships, especially with smaller…

International
5
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
6
Kind Inc

To assist and protect unaccompanied children who are parties to judicial or regulatory proceedings arising from the immigration laws of the u.s., whether in the context of removal proceedings or applications from asylum or otherwise, by…

Crime & Legal
7
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
8
Human Rights for Kids

Human Rights for Kids is an international non-profit organization dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights for children. We use an integrated, multi-faceted approach which consists of research & public education, coalition…

International
9
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
10
Operation Kindness

Our mission is to create a kinder world for pets and the people who love them by providing lifesaving care, innovative programs, and community resources.

Animals
11
Sos Outreach

Sos outreach changes young lives, building character and leadership in underserved kids through mentoring outdoors.

Recreation & Sports
12
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Finmango. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $200,000 · Human ServicesDENVER RESCUE MISSION+2 more: $7,675 · Human ServicesFAITH GLOBAL MINISTRIES: $12,500 · OtherFAITH GLOBAL MINISTRIESACTS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $8,500 · OtherACTS RESOURCE CENTER INCCOLORADO FALLEN HEROES FOUNDATION: $6,500 · OtherCOLORADO FALLEN HEROES FOUN…Individual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKEWOOD CHURCH: $5,550 · OtherLAKEWOOD CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFACT RELIEF FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherHOUSING 180: $3,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · Other+23 more: $22,250 · Other+23 moreDRY BONES DENVER: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterCAVALIER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC: $8,000 · AnimalsALIGHT ALLIANCE TO LEAD IMPACT IN GLOBAL: $2,500 · InternationalMothers Without Borders: $1,000 · HealthTWLOHA INC: $500 · HealthA CHILDS SONG INC: $1,000 · Education
Human Services$207,675Other$75,300Housing & Shelter$12,500Animals$8,000International$2,500Health$1,500Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDRY BONES DENVER: $12,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCAVALIER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC: $8,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetKINDNESSORG INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA CHILDS SONG INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOUTREACH360 INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMothers Without Borders: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds DRY BONES DENVER ↗
  • Who funds CAVALIER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Finmango ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ALLIANCE TO LEAD IMPACT IN GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds KINDNESSORG INC ↗
  • Who funds A CHILDS SONG INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH360 INC ↗
  • Who funds Mothers Without Borders ↗
  • Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roy and Ana Zellars Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roy and Ana Zellars Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roy and Ana Zellars’ filings →

    More from the funding graph