Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Rotary del Norte Foundation Inc

Support 501(c)(3) organizations whose programs assist the disadvantaged in the albuquerque metropolitan area.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of THE ROTARY DEL NORTE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $13,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $49,950 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $36,050 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT$7,000
ROTARY DEL NORTE BACKPACK PROGRAM$6,900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALTA MIRA SPECIALIZED FAMILY SERVIC: $6k → 14%HEART GALLERY OF NM: $11k → 14%NEW DAY YOUTH & FAMILY: $6k → 14%HEART GALLERY OF NM: $11k → 14%SAFE HOUSE: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$236k · 3 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$236k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF ALBUQUERQUE DEL NORTE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $147k · revenue +90% · 88% of their budget
  • TY
    THE YMCA OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $67k · revenue -84% · 79% of their budget
  • HG
    HEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • VI
    VETERAN'S INTEGRATION CENTERS OF NM
    one grant, 2024 · $31k
  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +62%
  • NP
    NATIONAL POLICE DOG FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
New Mexico Housing & Community Development Corporation

The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…

Housing & Shelter
3
New Mexico Kids Matter Inc

New mexico kids matter inc., serves as a court appointed special advocate to advocate for the best interest of abused, neglected and high-risk children.

Crime & Legal
4
New Mexico Child First Network Inc

The purpose of the new mexico child first network is to support children and their caretakers in the new mexico child protective services care and custody. the primary goal is to provide support and training to caregivers and children in…

Human Services
5
New Mexico Dream Center of Albuquerque

New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…

Religion
6
New Mexico Foundation for Open Government

To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.

Crime & Legal
7
New Mexico Law Enforcement Officers Foundation

To provide financial assistance to law enforcement related organizations, personnel and their families.

Human Services
8
The Food Depot

The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.

Human Services
9
New Mexico Reentry Center

Our mission is to stop the cycle of re-incarceration by providing training and support to the people of new mexico who are recovering from substance use disorders - mental health issues, while addressing housing insecurities.

Health
10
Cplc New Mexico Inc

Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…

Community Improvement
11
New Mexico Scottish Rite Foundation
12
Jewish Community Foundation of Nm

To build and perpetuate support for a vibrant, caring jewish community through partnerships with donors and organizations. the foundation receives, administers and disposes of funds for charitable purposes.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart Gallery of New Mexico Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Police Dog Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB OF ALBUQUERQUE DEL NORTE — $147,071 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF ALBUQUERQUE DEL NORTETHE YMCA OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $67,176 · OtherTHE YMCA OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INCVETERAN'S INTEGRATION CENTERS OF NM — $30,764 · OtherVETERAN'S INTEGRATION CENTERS OF NM+2 more — $12,900 · OtherHEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $21,900 · Human ServicesHEART GALLERY…ALTA MIRA SPECIALIZED FAMILY SERVICES INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesALTA MIRA SPE…A NEW DAY INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesA NEW DAY INCSAFE HOUSEINC — $5,500 · Human ServicesSAFE HOUSEINCUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $20,650 · EducationNATIONAL POLICE DOG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyRIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT — $7,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$257,911Human Services$39,400Education$20,650Philanthropy$10,000Food & Nutrition$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROTARY CLUB OF ALBUQUERQUE DEL NORTE — $147,071 over 4y, 88% of budgetTHE YMCA OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $67,176 over 4y, 79% of budgetHEART GALLERY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $21,900 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetNATIONAL POLICE DOG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALTA MIRA SPECIALIZED FAMILY SERVICES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE HOUSEINC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rotary del Norte Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rotary del Norte Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Rotary del Norte Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph