Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rosenberg Ebin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$372kEducation$334kYouth Development$209kPhilanthropy$60k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $131k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hunts Point Alliance for Children$25,000
Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program$25,000
CitySprouts Inc$21,000
GlassRoots$20,000
The Possible Zone$15,000
Dancing Classrooms Inc DCNYC CORE Prog$12,500
The Netanya Foundation Inc$12,000
Loco-Motion Dance Theatre for Child$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CitySprouts Inc: $21k → 8%The Possible Project Inc: $20k → 16%The Netanya Foundation Inc: $17k → 7%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $25k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program: $25k → 11%GlassRoots: $20k → 16%CitySprouts Inc: $16k → 8%The Possible Project Inc: $15k → 16%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $25k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program: $25k → 11%GlassRoots: $15k → 16%The Possible Project Inc: $15k → 8%The Possible Zone: $15k → 16%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $25k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - Pace Program: $20k → 11%GlassRoots: $13k → 16%The Possible Project Inc: $15k → 8%The Possible Zone: $15k → 16%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $20k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program: $20k → 11%GlassRoots: $13k → 16%CitySprouts Inc: $15k → 8%Dancing Classrooms Inc: $22k → 17%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $20k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program: $20k → 11%The Possible Project Inc: $15k → 8%Dancing Classrooms Inc: $15k → 17%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $20k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - Pace Program: $20k → 11%The Possible Project Inc: $15k → 8%Dancing Classrooms Inc: $13k → 17%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $19k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - Pace Program: $15k → 11%The Possible Project Inc: $14k → 8%Dancing Classrooms Inc DCNYC CORE Prog: $13k → 17%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $18k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program: $20k → 11%CitySprouts Inc: $14k → 8%Dancing Classrooms Inc DCNYC CORE Prog: $13k → 17%Hunts Point Alliance for Children: $17k → 28%Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program: $20k → 11%CitySprouts Inc: $16k → 8%Dancing Classrooms Inc DCNYC CORE Prog: $13k → 17%CitySprouts Inc: $16k → 8%Dancing Classrooms Inc DCNYC CORE Prog: $13k → 17%CitySprouts Inc: $16k → 8%CitySprouts Inc: $16k → 8%CitySprouts Inc: $16k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$964k · 10 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$964k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-5%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $188k · revenue +25%
  • CI
    CITYSPROUTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +81%
  • TP
    THE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $139k · revenue +507%

Funded once

  • New Urban Arts
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Performing Arts Inc

Provide high quality low cost performing arts classes to underserved children in Harlem and the surrounding neigborhoods.

Arts & Culture
2
Learning Through an Expanded Arts Program Inc

Learning through an expanded arts program, inc's (leap) mission is to provide educational arts programs to promote access and equity for new york city students underserved in the arts. we inspire diverse school communities to love learning…

Education
3
Dancewave Inc

Dancewave, Inc. is a nonprofit arts organization that transforms the lives of New York City youth through unique exposure to world-class, pre-professional performing arts training.

—
4
Studio in a School Association Inc

From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.

—
5
Urban Arts Academy

The mission of the Urban Arts Academy is to bring neighborhood people together from diverse cultures by providing creative experiences in the arts with children and families to develop the gifts of self-expression and community.

—
6
Move(Nyc) Foundation Inc

Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…

Public Benefit
7
Factory Street Studio & Moving Parts Inc

Dance & movement performance

Arts & Culture
8
Art Sparks

Artsparks mission is to provide access to high-quality dance programming, to foster the understanding of dance as an art form, and to challenge students of all ages and abilities to discover new heights of individual excellence through…

Arts & Culture
9
University Plaza Nursery School

University Plaza Nursery School is a parent run cooperative nursery school that seeks to provide a high quality preschool experience for children in the surrounding community.

—
10
Stem Kids Nyc

To bridge the gap between the current school curriculum and the immediate need for schools to prepare students for STEM skills and for jobs that do not yet exist.

Education
11
National Dance Institute

The purposes of the corporation are to introduce and foster the arts into the experience, participation and knowledge of children using dance as a catalyst; promote the belief that the arts are primary and vital in our society and should…

Arts & Culture
12
Inner City Ensemble Inc

The arts nonprofit offers free dance and theatre training and shows to hundreds local children and teenagers in Paterson, NJ and low-cost events and presentations to the community. Our focus is on Arts, Cultural, Education, Shows &…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dancing Classrooms Inc; the most unlike its peers is Loco-Motion Dance Theatre for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Norton Museum of Art - AAO Program: $130,000 · OtherNorton Museum of Art - AAO ProgramDancing Classrooms Inc DCNYC CORE Prog: $70,000 · OtherDancing Classrooms Inc DCNYC CORE Pr…THE NETANYA FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE NETANYA FOUNDATION INCNorton Museum of Art - Pace Program: $55,000 · OtherNorton Museum of Art - Pace ProgramHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $188,100 · Youth DevelopmentHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENGLASSROOTS INC: $97,000 · Youth DevelopmentGLASSROOTS INCCITYSPROUTS INC: $146,100 · EnvironmentCITYSPROUTS INCTHE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC: $139,404 · EducationTHE POSSIBLE PRO…Dancing Classrooms Inc: $70,500 · Arts & CultureDancing Cl…New Urban Arts: $12,000 · Arts & CultureNew Urban …LOCO-MOTION DANCE THEATRE FOR CHILDREN INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureLOCO-MOTIO…
Other$315,000Youth Development$285,100Environment$146,100Education$139,404Arts & Culture$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $188,100 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetCITYSPROUTS INC: $146,100 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetTHE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC: $139,404 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGLASSROOTS INC: $97,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetDancing Classrooms Inc: $70,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NETANYA FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetNew Urban Arts: $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLOCO-MOTION DANCE THEATRE FOR CHILDREN INC: $7,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUNTS POINT ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CITYSPROUTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSIBLE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GLASSROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dancing Classrooms Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NETANYA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds New Urban Arts ↗
  • Who funds LOCO-MOTION DANCE THEATRE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosenberg Ebin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosenberg Ebin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Citysprouts Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Glassroots Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Possible Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosenberg Ebin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph