Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rose Family Foundation Co John L Rose Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$180kHealth$131kCivil Rights$50kHuman Services$17kHousing & Shelter$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kReligion$500Food & Nutrition$400Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY TRINITY MIGRANT FUND$50,000
TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION$50,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
LA LUMIERE SCHOOL$5,000
EASTER SEALS OF DUPAGE COUNTY$2,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC$2,000
ELMHURST HOSPITAL$2,000
ANN ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITA$2,000
HINSDALE HOSPITAL ASSEMBLY$1,000
IMPACT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH PARTNERS$1,000
GENEVA LAKE WATER SAFETY PATROL$1,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
UNION CHURCH OF HINSDALE$500
SALVATION ARMY$500
THE COMMUNITY HOUSE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $500 → 7%TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
IN
OH
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 13 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$305k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+3%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +40%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +97%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -25%
  • UC
    U CHCGO MEDICINE ADVENT HEALTH HINS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • PW
    PRADER WILLI SYNDROME FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush System for Health

The mission of Rush University System for Health is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities it serves through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research, and community partnerships.

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations (see schedule o)

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
Rush Oak Park Hospital Inc

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
12
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community House; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA LUMIERE SCHOOL INC: $145,000 · EducationLA LUMIERE SCHOOL INCIndiana University Foundation: $35,000 · EducationIndiana University FoundationHOLY TRINITY MIGRANT FUND: $50,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY MIGRANT FUNDSHEPHERDS MINISTRIES FOUNDATION: $21,500 · OtherSHEPHERDS MINISTRIES FOUNDATIONANN ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITA: $9,500 · OtherANN ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOS…CLEVELAND CLINIC: $9,500 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICEASTER SEALS OF DUPAGE COUNTY: $5,500 · Other+9 more: $10,800 · Other+9 moreTURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $53,000 · Human ServicesTURNING POINTE A…THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HO…MAYO CLINIC: $21,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICRush University Medical Center: $12,000 · HealthRush Univer…BROOKS STRONG FOUNDATION: $3,500 · HealthBROOKS STRO…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthFeeding America: $400 · Food & NutritionHINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 · Animals
Education$180,000Other$106,800Human Services$57,000Health$39,000Food & Nutrition$400Animals$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA LUMIERE SCHOOL INC: $145,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $53,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $35,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $21,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKS STRONG FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA LUMIERE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BROOKS STRONG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rose Family Foundation Co John L Rose Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rose Family Foundation Co John L Rose Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rose Family Foundation Co John L Rose Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph