· Private foundation
The Ronda E Stryker and William D Johnston Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of THE RONDA E STRYKER AND WILLIAM D JOHNSTON FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $231k
- $50k–250k115 grants · $16M
- $250k+37 grants · $37M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $5,000,000 |
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC | $3,774,731 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF KALAMAZOO | $2,100,000 |
| ECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER | $2,000,000 |
| ECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER | $2,000,000 |
| NEW CONNECTIONS OF KALAMAZOO | $1,836,940 |
| HELPING HANDS WELLNESS CENTER | $1,644,254 |
| LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION (LISC)- KALAMAZOO | $1,529,600 |
| YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO | $1,435,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC SCHOLARSHIP | $1,183,483 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN | $1,166,666 |
| REACH SOBER LIVING INC | $1,000,000 |
| KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S | $1,000,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS | $895,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS | $895,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $23.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
105 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YWYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO MI7× · 2018–2024 · $21M · revenue +31% · 88% of their budget
- PWPREVENTION WORKS INC6× · 2018–2023 · $11M · revenue +5%
- UAUrban Alliance Inc6× · 2018–2024 · $8.4M · revenue +9% · 77% of their budget
Funded once
- TFTHE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCEone grant, 2017 · $15M
- ISINTEGRATED SERVICES OF KALAMAZOOone grant, 2021 · $3.0M
- KFKVCC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $1.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Kalamazoo housing advocate is a nonprofit working to break the cycle of homelessness in kalamazoo county.
The mission of the kalamazoo foundation for excellence is to support the goals of the city of kalamazoo, fund aspirational investments in the city, and empower kalamazoo residents to achieve the lives they want for themselves and their…
The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…
Probation residential center - alternative correctional facility and outpatient treatment facility
The mission of the kalamazoo humane society is to nuture the wellbeing of animals and people in our communities.
The mission of the Kalamazoo Civic Theatre, with community partners and volunteers, is to create and deliver engaging, inspiring theatrical productions and educational experiences that spark delight, build community, encourage…
To assure housing for socially and economically vulnerable residents of kalamazoo county.
To promote the arts of book printing, binding, printmaking, papermaking, and creative writing through a community workshop, teaching classes, publishing, and exhibitions
Assist downtown development authority in implementing the arcadia creek plan.
Create relationships & experiences that welcome and inspire people to discover, enjoy, value, and care for nature. Kalamazoo Nature Center envisions a resilient community where all people have strong interconnections with the natural world.
Supporting organization to kalamazoo community foundation
South county community services (sccs) is the only human service agency dedicated to serving the 25,000 residents who live in the southern tier of kalamazoo county. with a mission to work with families to improve quality of life, the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kalamazoo Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Institute of Public Scholarship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO MI ↗
- Who funds PREVENTION WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Early Learning Neighborhood Collaborative ↗
- Who funds Urban Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF KALAMAZOO ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO COUNTY READY 4S ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALING CENTERS ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS WELLNESS CENTER INC KALAMAZOO ↗
- Who funds New Connections of Kalamazoo ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC AMERICAN COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds DOUGLASS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KALAMAZOO INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO YOUTH DEVELOPMENT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SW MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds LIFT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Family Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REACH SOBER LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO COUNTY DEFENDER INC ↗
- Who funds ROOTEAD ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds MINISTRY WITH COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds Kalamazoo Neighborhood Housing Serv ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY NETWORK SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH STRATEGY FOR ADVOCACY AND ACTION IN THE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOORS KALAMAZOO ↗
- Who funds READ AND WRITE KALAMAZOO ↗
- Who funds ERACCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOMEWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG KINGS AND QUEENS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · United Way of South Central Michigan · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Ws & Lois Vandalson Foundation · Enna Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ronda E Stryker and William D Johnston Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ronda E Stryker and William D Johnston Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Ronda E Stryker and William D Johnston Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.