Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ronald and Marilyn Leach Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$205kHuman Services$160kCommunity Improvement$143kEducation$77kReligion$61kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kFood & Nutrition$42kCrime & Legal$18k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
$8,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CITY MISSION$22,700
THE SALVATION ARMY$17,900
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$12,100
NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES (GLOBAL TRES SE)$10,800
AGAPE INTERNATIONAL MISSION$10,800
CHURCH OF GOD MINISTRIES CBH$8,500
CHILDREN OF PROMISE$8,300
CLEVELAND FOODBANK$7,300
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,300
HOLT INTERNATIONAL$6,900
AMERICARES$4,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 15%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
OR
IN
OH
CT
CA
KS
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$737k · 14 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$737k
$11k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHILDREN OF PROMISE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +30%
  • AI
    Agape International Missions
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +119%
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • NC
    NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES (GLOBAL TRES SE)
    one grant, 2025 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
Global Commission Partners Inc

Global commission partners is an evangelical missionary not for profit organization dedicated to evaluate and support native ministries who are planting the gospel of jesus christ among unreach people groups in poor countries.

Philanthropy
4
Christian Ministries International
—
5
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
6
Opal Ministries Inc

Serving churches and christian leaders in the majority world by equipping them with affordable bibles and quality evangelical literture.

Religion
7
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
8
International Crisis Aid Inc

Provide aid to people in need worldwide

Human Services
9
Angels in Africa
International
10
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
11
Adventist Health International

Enable, empower, and strengthen the multi-faceted health ministry and mission of the Seventh-day Adventist Church throughout the world.

International
12
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nazarene Compassionate Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aid for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY MISSION: $142,500 · OtherCITY MISSIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $112,400 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCHURCH OF GOD MINISTRIES CBH: $46,500 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD MINISTRIES CBHAgape International Missions: $46,100 · OtherAgape International MissionsAMERICAN RED CROSS: $43,900 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSAID FOR KIDS: $19,500 · OtherNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL FUND: $17,500 · Other+2 more: $14,800 · OtherCHILDREN OF PROMISE INC: $47,200 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF …HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $37,400 · Human ServicesHOLT INTERNA…ANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC: $77,000 · EducationANDERSON UN…NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES INC: $53,300 · ReligionAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $48,200 · InternationalGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $41,900 · Food & Nutrition
Other$443,200Human Services$84,600Education$77,000Religion$53,300International$48,200Food & Nutrition$41,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC: $77,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES INC: $53,300 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $48,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF PROMISE INC: $47,200 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAgape International Missions: $46,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $41,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $37,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR KIDS: $19,500 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetCRESCENT PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AID FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ronald and Marilyn Leach Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ronald and Marilyn Leach Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ronald and Marilyn Leach’s filings →

More from the funding graph