· Private foundation
The Rona and Jeffrey Abramson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $402k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $476k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY | $889,340 |
| BRAHMANANDA SARASWATI FOUNDATION | $677,128 |
| AFRICA COLLEGE FUND | $262,500 |
| DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION | $122,525 |
| MGANL MOTHER DIVINE PROGRAM | $98,162 |
| MAHARISHI PURUSHA PROGRAM | $71,080 |
| MAHARISHI FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL | $67,500 |
| UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $66,666 |
| THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL | $35,000 |
| THE GREATER WASHINGTON JEWISH COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE | $33,333 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON | $33,333 |
| RAAM RAJ FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK | $25,000 |
| EVERGLADES FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $337k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.
83 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MIMAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $7.2M · revenue +42%
- BSBRAHMANANDA SARASWATI FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +953% · 27% of their budget
- BSBRAHMANANDA SARASWATI YAGYA FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $1.8M · revenue +26%
Funded once
- CFCenter for the Advancement of Integrative Healthone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -97% · 98% of their budget
- MGMAHARISHI GLOBAL ADMINISTRATION THROUGH NATURAL LAWone grant, 2020 · $85k
- NBNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM (10K-ED25K-ANNL)one grant, 2018 · $35k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…
The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Meridian international center is a nonpartisan diplomacy institution founded in 1960 to advance american leadership. headquartered on a historic campus in washington dc, our mission is to empower leaders to advance the next era of…
The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
To research and develop centrist policy ideas.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
How this is measured
112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 167 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAHARISHI INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BRAHMANANDA SARASWATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRAHMANANDA SARASWATI YAGYA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE ↗
- Who funds MAHARISHI PURUSHA PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PROJECTS FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds AFRICA COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL MOTHER DIVINE ORG USA TM PROGRAM FOR WOMEN PROFESSIONALS ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds Friends of Cancer Research ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Center for the Advancement of Integrative Health ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
- Who funds Raam Raj Foundation ↗
- Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEIFETZ INTERNATIONAL MUSIC INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Washington Jewish Coalition Contd ↗
- Who funds Maharishi Foundation International ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALS ASSOCIATION DCMDVA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC ↗
- Who funds THE SALZBURG FESTIVAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Galena-Yorktown Foundation · The Gary and Pennie Abramson Charitable Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Schwartz Family Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Invincibility Foundation · The Annette M Lerner and Theodore N Lerner Family Foundation Inc · Bender Foundation Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Rona and Jeffrey Abramson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rona and Jeffrey Abramson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
- Greater Washington Jewish Coalition Contd: 28% of income from government
- Art Works Studio School Inc: 23% of income from government
- Moco Kidsco Inc: 15% of income from government
- Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
- The Strathmore Hall Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
- The Sundari Foundation Inc: 5% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
- Bender Jcc of Greater Washington: 1% of income from government
- Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Rona and Jeffrey Abramson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Rona and Jeffrey Abramson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Rona and Jeffrey Abramson’s filings →