Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rohr Foundation Co Bank of America Private Bank

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$788k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$186k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Arts & Culture$2.1MEducation$1.2MHealth$1.0MEnvironment$587kInternational$326kYouth Development$250kPublic Benefit$250kCommunity Improvement$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $778k
$70,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$185,629
THE EMERGE FOUNDATION$100,000
CITY YEAR DALLAS$100,000
FRIENDS OF CHARLES DARWIN FOUNDATIO$87,000
THE EMERGE FOUNDATION$70,000
NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIV$70,000
AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA$64,950
CAFE MOMENTUM$50,000
PAUL QUINN COLLEGE$50,000
LAMA DORJE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MASS INSTITUTE OF TECH: $50k → 8%CITY YEAR DALLAS: $200k → 16%AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA: $77k → 6%FRIENDS OF CHARLES DARWIN FOUNDATIO: $87k → 9%FIT FOUNDATION: $33k → 17%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10k → 5%CITY YEAR DALLAS: $100k → 14%THE OCEAN FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIV: $143k → 13%INSTITUTE FOR TROPICAL ECOL AND CON: $15k → 19%LAMA DORJE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%RETT SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%THE EMERGE FOUNDATION: $150k → 19%MASS INSTITUTE OF TECH: $50k → 8%CITY YEAR DALLAS: $125k → 16%AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA: $65k → 6%FIT FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10k → 5%GIRLS INC: $83k → 14%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIV: $70k → 13%RETT SYNDROME: $23k → 16%THE EMERGE FOUNDATION: $150k → 19%CITY YEAR DALLAS: $125k → 16%AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA: $60k → 6%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10k → 5%GIRLS INC: $50k → 14%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIV: $70k → 13%THE EMERGE FOUNDATION: $103k → 19%AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA: $60k → 6%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10k → 5%GIRLS INC: $33k → 14%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIV: $70k → 13%THE EMERGE FOUNDATION: $100k → 19%AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA: $21k → 6%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10k → 5%GIRLS INC: $33k → 14%THE EMERGE CENTER: $100k → 19%PAUL QUINN COLLEGE: $50k → 14%THE EMERGE FOUNDATION: $100k → 19%CITY YEAR DALLAS: $100k → 14%THE EMERGE FOUNDATION: $100k → 19%CITY YEAR DALLAS: $100k → 14%THE EMERGE FOUNDATION: $70k → 19%TEXAS 2036: $125k → 14%THE EMERGE CENTER: $10k → 19%TEXAS 2036: $125k → 14%THE EMERGE CENTER: $10k → 19%CAFE MOMENTUM: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of The Rohr Foundation Co Bank of America Private Bank’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Rohr Foundation Co Bank of America Private Banklessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 10 repeat orgs$951k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$5.0M
$754k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+159%

Still filing today

80%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropyEnvironmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +25%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $353k · revenue +27%
  • AO
    AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $316k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $511k
  • The Ocean Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +55%
  • EE
    EQTX Equality Texas Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue +159%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

8
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Year Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $2,105,806 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONIndividual grant recipient — $511,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY YEAR DALLAS — $450,000 · OtherCITY YEAR DALLASCITY YEAR INC — $300,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCGIRLS INC — $200,000 · OtherGIRLS INCFRIENDS OF CHARLES DARWIN FOUNDATIO — $87,000 · OtherEQTX Equality Texas Foundation — $70,000 · Other+8 more — $235,387 · Other+8 moreTHE EMERGE CENTER INC — $895,750 · PhilanthropyTHE EMERGE CENTE…Nova Southeastern University Inc — $353,280 · EducationNova Sout…Massachusetts Institute of Technology — $100,000 · EducationMassachus…Paul Quinn College — $50,000 · EducationPaul Quin…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $315,650 · InternationalTexas 2036 — $250,000 · Public BenefitThe Ocean Foundation — $100,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$2,105,806Other$1,853,387Philanthropy$895,750Education$508,280International$315,650Public Benefit$250,000Environment$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $2,105,806 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMERGE CENTER INC — $895,750 over 7y, 26% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc — $353,280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC — $315,650 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTexas 2036 — $250,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEQTX Equality Texas Foundation — $70,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION — $57,762 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPaul Quinn College — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMIT2DALLAS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds THE EMERGE CENTER INC
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc
  • Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds Texas 2036
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds The Ocean Foundation
  • Who funds EQTX Equality Texas Foundation
  • Who funds FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Paul Quinn College
  • Who funds COMMIT2DALLAS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rohr Foundation Co Bank of America Private Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph