Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rod N McDonald Famiy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Animals$90kFood & Nutrition$84kHealth$65kPhilanthropy$20kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$10kEnvironment$6kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$653k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA FOOD BANK$10,000
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION$9,000
POLAR BEARS INTL$6,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$5,000
WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$3,000
NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS$2,500
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL HEALTH$1,000
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$600
Individual grant recipient$600
DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ST JUDES: $500 → 17%MANNA FOOD BANK: $10k → 12%VRCC ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%HELLEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $500 → 11%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%MANNA FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%VRCC ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%VRCC ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION: $21k → 11%NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $11k → 8%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $2k → 12%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 8%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $1k → 12%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $6k → 8%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 8%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION: $9k → 11%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%MCCALLUM THEATRE: $10k → 11%HIGH LINE CANAL: $1k → 12%EISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $1k → 12%DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $1k → 12%SOLDIERS ORGANIZED SERVICES: $1k → 11%HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $1k → 12%SOLDIERS ORGANIZED SERVICES: $1k → 11%HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $1k → 12%SOLDIERS ORGANIZED SERVICES: $1k → 11%HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
NY
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$262k · 20 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$262k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+89%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPublic BenefitPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +76%
  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +124%
  • PB
    POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • MT
    MCCALLUM THEATRE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • RC
    RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
6
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
7
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

8
The Colorado Humane Society & Spca Inc

See schedule o.to prevent cruelty and neglect of animals within the state of colorado by:-assisting agencies in the enforcement of laws relating to cruelty and neglect of companion animals and equines-educating the public on animal welfare…

9
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
10
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
11
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
12
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is Soldiers Organized Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATION — $55,000 · OtherEISENHOWER MEDICAL CTR FOUNDATIONMEALS ON WHEELS — $42,473 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSMCCALLUM THEATRE — $10,000 · OtherMCCALLUM THEATRENATIONAL MS SOCIETY — $6,000 · OtherHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY — $5,500 · OtherCHALLENGED ATHELETES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherSOLDIERS ORGANIZED SERVICES — $5,000 · Other+7 more — $11,200 · Other+7 moreTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $26,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCT…POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL — $21,500 · AnimalsPOLAR BEARS INTERNATI…DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $6,000 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS L…DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Animals+1 more — $500 · AnimalsNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS — $29,400 · Food & NutritionNOURISH MEALS O…MANNA FOOD BANK INC — $12,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $30,550 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPAN…CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED AT…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $18,814 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $1,400 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $2,500 · Public BenefitMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $500 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 · Health
Other$140,173Animals$56,500Food & Nutrition$41,400Human Services$34,550Philanthropy$21,214Public Benefit$2,500Education$500Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $30,550 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS — $29,400 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL — $21,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $18,814 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY — $5,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOLDIERS ORGANIZED SERVICES — $5,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
  • Who funds NOURISH MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
  • Who funds POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
  • Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds SOLDIERS ORGANIZED SERVICES
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT
  • Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rod N McDonald Famiy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph