Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rockfall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$197kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$19kEducation$16kRecreation & Sports$12kHousing & Shelter$5kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$4,900
CONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOC$4,000
FOUNTAIN HILL CEMETARY ASSOCIATIO$3,600
BUSHY HILL NATURE CENTER$3,500
TWO COYOTES WILDNERNESS SCHOOL$3,500
EVERYONE OUTSIDE INC$3,500
VALLEY SHORE YMCA$3,500
CONNECTICUT RIVER MUSEUM$2,950
BROWNSTONE QUORUM$1,800
OLD SAYBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,050
EAST HAMPTON CLEAN ENERGY TASK FORC$900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $4k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $3k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $3k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $3k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $3k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $3k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $3k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $3k → 7%CAMP HAZEN YMCA: $2k → 7%VALLEY SHORE YMCA: $2k → 7%ESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 18 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
44

Total granted

$160k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+27%

Still filing today

33%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    Valley Shore YMCA Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +48%
  • EO
    EVERYONE OUTSIDE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +20%
  • TC
    THE CONNECTICUT RIVER FOUNDATION AT STEAMBOAT DOCK INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SI
    SOUNDWATERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +61%
  • NE
    NORTH END ACTION TEAM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kestrel Land Trust

Kestrel land trust conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
2
Aspetuck Land Trust

Founded in 1966, Aspetuck Land Trust is a non-profit membership ogranization whose mission is to protect land forever and connect people to the natural world.

Environment
3
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
4
Kestrel Land Trust Inc

Kestrel land trust inc. conserves and cares for forests, farms, and riverways in the connecticut river valley of western massachusetts, while nurturing an enduring love of the land

Environment
5
Redding Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of Redding Land Trust is to preserve the natural resources of the Town of Redding, CT and to promote the scientific and educational study of local and natural resources, and to acquire, by gift or purchase, land or…

Environment
6
Haddam Land Trust Inc

Preservation of natural resources in the town of haddam, connecticut.

Environment
7
Royal River Conservation Trust

The royal river conservation trust (rrct) is a regional land trust working primarily in seven maine municipalities. the trust owns,cares for, and stewards land and conservation easements to protect land and water resources for the general…

Environment
8
Sebasticook Regional Land Trust

The mission of the SRLT is to recognize and conserve the rich wild and workinglandscape of Central Maine's Sebasticook River watershed through conservation,stewardship and education. Our focal programs are land conservation for…

Environment
9
Watertown Land Trust

Preservation of open space in watertown, ct; maintenance of owned and conserved properties and public education of enviromental issues.

—
10
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
11
Farmington Land Trust

The Farmington Land Trust Inc protects open space in the town of Farmington CT through the acquisition of open space, stewardship of acquired land, education of the public about the importance of open space and advocacy that ensures…

Environment
12
Manchester Land Conservation Trust Inc

To engage in and otherwise promote the benefit of the general public the preservation and conservation of the natural resources in the greater manchester, connecticut area, including water resources, swamps, woodlands and other spaces, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Artfarm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIDDLETOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $14,760 · OtherMIDDLETOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLSCT AUDOBON SOCIETY: $9,720 · OtherCT AUDOBON SOCIETYCT RIVER MUSEUM: $9,080 · OtherCT RIVER MUSEUMCOMMODORE MACDONOUGH ELEMENTARY SCH: $8,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherBUSHY HILL NATURE CENTER: $8,500 · OtherMXCC FOUNDATION: $6,850 · OtherLONG HILL ESTATE AUTHORITY: $6,500 · Other+37 more: $94,399 · Other+37 moreEVERYONE OUTSIDE: $16,620 · EnvironmentEVERYONE OUTSID…SOUNDWATERS INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentSOUNDWATERS INCCONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentCONNECTICUT RIV…Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc: $4,350 · EnvironmentConnecticut Lan…EAST HADDAM LAND TRUST INC: $3,500 · EnvironmentEAST HADDAM LAN…LYME LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentMIDDLESEX LAND TRUST: $1,500 · EnvironmentValley Shore YMCA Inc: $25,725 · Human ServicesValley Shore…ESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesESTUARY COUN…CAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTWO COYOTES WILDERNESS SCHOOL INC: $7,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4,900 · EducationTHE INDEPENDENT DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,250 · EducationBRAINERD MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $1,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOCIATION: $13,000 · Recreation & SportsPATHFINDERS INC: $2,654 · Recreation & SportsTHE CONNECTICUT RIVER FOUNDATION AT STEAMBOAT DOCK INC: $6,950 · Arts & CultureARTFARM: $2,900 · Arts & CultureI-PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · AnimalsFREE CENTER INCORPORATED: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$166,909Environment$38,970Human Services$30,225Education$16,150Recreation & Sports$15,654Arts & Culture$11,850Animals$2,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetValley Shore YMCA Inc: $25,725 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetEVERYONE OUTSIDE: $16,620 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTWO COYOTES WILDERNESS SCHOOL INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT RIVER FOUNDATION AT STEAMBOAT DOCK INC: $6,950 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUNDWATERS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConnecticut Land Conservation Council Inc: $4,350 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCT LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEAST HADDAM LAND TRUST INC: $3,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTFARM: $2,900 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetKILLINGWORTH LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $2,735 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPATHFINDERS INC: $2,654 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $2,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetI-PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIDDLESEX LAND TRUST: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST VINCENT DEPAUL MIDDLETOWN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP HAZEN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAINERD MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Valley Shore YMCA Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVERYONE OUTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TWO COYOTES WILDERNESS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONNECTICUT RIVER FOUNDATION AT STEAMBOAT DOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUNDWATERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds CT LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST HADDAM LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ESTUARY COUNCIL OF SENIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTFARM ↗
  • Who funds KILLINGWORTH LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Middlesex County IncCT26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Middlesex County Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Kitchings Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Westbrook Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rockfall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rockfall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Connecticut Forest & Park Association: 16% of income from government
  • Lyme Land Conservation Trust Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc: 12% of income from government
  • I-Park Foundation Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Sea Research Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • St Vincent Depaul Middletown: 6% of income from government
  • Soundwaters Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Two Coyotes Wilderness School Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Brainerd Memorial Library: 0% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rockfall Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Rockfall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rockfall’s filings →

More from the funding graph