How much did THE ROBERT P AND ARLENE R KOGOD FAMILY grant in FY2021?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of THE ROBERT P AND ARLENE R KOGOD FAMILY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

conservancytheatrevillagemount desertcapitalsan franciscopark

2019

fabfilmsmedicalmount deserttheatrecongregationcapitalvillage

2020

theatrecongregationmount desertsan franciscovillageresearchnortheast harbor

2021

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2021 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

Under $10k36 grants · $116k
$10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$50k–250k2 grants · $200k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$6k

Total assets

Largest grants

CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES$100,000
EDLAVITCH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF WASHINGTON DC$100,000
TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM$15,000
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING$7,500
GESHER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$7,500
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$7,500
FOUNDATION FOR ART AND PRESERVATION IN EMBASSIES$5,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN VA$5,000
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION$5,000
THEATREWASHINGTON$5,000
PANIM$5,000
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION$5,000
BREAD FOR THE CITY$5,000
HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 49% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$36M · 178 repeat orgs$299k to everyone else

178 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2021, 139 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

178

Total granted

$36M

$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%

+96%

Still filing today

55%

34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentInternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NG
NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART
3× · 2017–2019 · $1.7M · revenue +14%
SH
SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA
4× · 2017–2020 · $1.3M · revenue +24%
ST
SIGNATURE THEATRE
4× · 2017–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +82%

Funded once

PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +160%
SR
SUMMER RESIDENTS ASSOC TOWN OF MT DESERT
one grant, 2020 · $30k
AA
AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—

Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—

Hillel At the George Washington

Enriching the lives of jewish students.

—

United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—

The Pierpont Morgan Library

Museum and independent research library (see Schedule O)located in the heart of New York City, the Morgan Library & Museum began as the personal library of financier, collector, and cultural benefactor J. Pierpont Morgan (1837-1913). The…

Education

Apollo Theater Foundation Inc

The apollo theater is a commissioner and presenter; catalyst for new artists, audiences, and creative workforce; and partner in the projection of the african american narrative and its role in the development of american and global culture.

Arts & Culture

University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

Museum of Latin American Art

The museum of latin american arts expands knowledge and appreciation of modern and contemporary latin american and latino art through its collection, ground-breaking exhibitions, stimulating educational programs, and engaging cultural…

Arts & Culture

The Art Institute of Chicago

The Art Institute of Chicago, a not-for-profit corporation, is both a museum and an institution of higher education that exists to provide appreciation and education in visual fine arts and design.

Education

The Jewish Studio Project

Jsp cultivates creativity as a jewish practice for spiritual connection and social transformation. we envision a future in which every person is connected to their inherent creativity as a force for healing, liberation and transformation.

Religion

Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture

New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edlavitch Jewish Community Center of and the most unlike its peers is Trinity University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/124

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,441

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

120 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

116/120

Grantees still filing

81/120

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$21,831,378Arts & Culture$7,110,675Community Improvement$3,053,000International$1,556,500Health$1,121,500Environment$1,105,500Education$964,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendolyn CafritzDC44.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Jewish Federation of Greater · Dimick Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation · Dallas Morse Coors Foundation for the · Florence V Burden Foundation · Galena-Yorktown Foundation · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · Diana Davis Spencer Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE ROBERT P AND ARLENE R KOGOD FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

10get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MOUNT DESERT 365.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~42 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 821645703 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MOUNT DESERT 365, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 42 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 95% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family?

Find your warmest path to The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE ROBERT P AND ARLENE R KOGOD FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

120 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family?

More from the funding graph

THE ROBERT P AND ARLENE R KOGOD FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

120 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family?

More from the funding graph