Skip to content

· Public charity

The Robert F Wolfe & Edgar T Wolfe Foundation

THE ROBERT F WOLFE & EDGAR T WOLFE FOUNDATION is a supporting organization of the columbus foundation.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$83MEducation$21MPhilanthropy$5.4MAnimals$5.0MYouth Development$2.0MArts & Culture$667kHuman Services$260kEnvironment$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $240k
  • $250k+1 grant · $10M
$86,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$475M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000,000
NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$96,000
OHIOHEALTH FOUNDATION INC$86,000
CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY (COSI)$58,000
COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$24,000
BUCKEYE LAKE AREA STAR SPANGLED TRADITION (BLASST)$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC DBA: $250k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92M · 5 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$92M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+8%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $65M · revenue +23%
  • FC
    FRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA COSI COLUMBUS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $557k · revenue +16%
  • BL
    BUCKEYE LAKE FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $110k · revenue +564%

Funded once

  • CZ
    COLUMBUS ZOOLOGICAL PARK ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5.0M · revenue -1%
  • SC
    ST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $3.0M
  • DF
    DIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue +8% · 27% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
2
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
3
Cincinnati Observatory Center

The mission of the cincinnati observatory is to maintain the integrity and heritage of an historic 19th century observatory and to educate, engage, and inspire our community about astronomy and science.

Arts & Culture
4
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
5
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
6
Columbus Early Learning Centers

Columbus early learning centers (celc) has over 130 years of history providing high quality, affordable early learning and childcare in central ohio. this rich history places celc amongst the oldest early childcare programs in the country.…

—
7
Ohio History Connection Foundation

None

—
8
Columbus State University Foundation Inc

The Columbus State University Foundation supports educational excellence and the expansion of educational opportunities at Columbus State University. The Foundation attracts, receives, invests, manages, and expends gifts and other…

Education
9
Columbus Youth Foundation

The columbus youth foundation supports recreational programs for underprivileged youth in columbus.

—
10
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

—
11
Joy Outdoor Education Center Foundation Inc

Helping people grow and succeed through life-long, experience-based learning.

Environment
12
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbus Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Buckeye Lake Fourth of July Celebration Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $65,000,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000,000 · EducationNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $25,964,800 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL I…ST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $3,000,000 · OtherST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOLCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF COLUMBUS: $2,000,000 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF COLUMBUS+4 more: $1,786,000 · Other+4 moreCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $10,507,000 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBUS F…COLUMBUS ZOOLOGICAL PARK ASSOCIATION: $5,000,000 · AnimalsDIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $2,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA COSI COLUMBUS: $557,000 · Arts & CultureBUCKEYE LAKE FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION ASSOCIATION INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $250,000 · Human Services
Education$66,000,000Other$32,750,800Philanthropy$10,507,000Animals$5,000,000Youth Development$2,000,000Arts & Culture$667,000Human Services$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $65,000,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $10,507,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS ZOOLOGICAL PARK ASSOCIATION: $5,000,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetDIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $2,000,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetUNITED SCHOOLS: $1,000,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA COSI COLUMBUS: $557,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBUCKEYE LAKE FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION ASSOCIATION INC: $110,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Central Ohio Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS ZOOLOGICAL PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA COSI COLUMBUS ↗
  • Who funds OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKEYE LAKE FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Ohio Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH24.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · L Brands Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · Meuse Family Foundation · Margaret and Robert Walter Foundation · Columbus Jewish Foundation · Battelle Memorial Institute · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Siemer Family Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus · Cardinal Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert F Wolfe & Edgar T Wolfe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert F Wolfe & Edgar T Wolfe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Robert F Wolfe & Edgar T Wolfe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Robert F Wolfe & Edgar T Wolfe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert F Wolfe & Edgar T Wolfe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph