Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert E Evans and Kathleen K Evans Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$71kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$15kHealth$11kReligion$9kPhilanthropy$7kRecreation & Sports$5kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
4
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALEM COMMUNITY CORP-BRIARWOOD CONTINUING CARE$1,000
ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$500
FIDALGO ROTARY CLUB$500
FORDHAM PREPARATORY SCHOOL$400
WORCESTER ART MUSEUM$250
WACHUSETT FOOD PANTRY$200
CEREBAL PALSY ALLIANCE$200
HOLDEN WOMAN'S CLUB$150
Individual grant recipient$130
ECOTARIUM MUSEUM$100
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEADS: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
RI
CA
AZ
AR
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 33 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
31

Total granted

$129k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+69%

Still filing today

36%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IW
    ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +14%
  • AM
    AACA MUSEUM INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $7k · revenue +11%
  • WG
    WACHUSETT GREENWAYS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $3k · revenue +598%

Funded once

  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • WC
    WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
6
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

—
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
9
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter Inc

The organization promotes high professional standards and provides governance education to boards of directors and senior corporate management.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Massachusetts and Rhode Island Inc; the most unlike its peers is Laurie C Tinsley Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $57,500 · EducationILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY+1 more: $1,450 · EducationSALEM COMMUNITY CORP-BRIARWOOD CONTINUING CARE: $15,880 · OtherSALEM COMMUNITY CORP-BRIARWOOD CONTINUING CAREDEVEREUX SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherDEVEREUX SCHOOLFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $7,400 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHLARZ ANDERSON-AUTO MUSEUM: $5,045 · OtherLARZ ANDERSON-AUTO MUSEUMEAGLES HILL SCHOOL: $3,100 · Other+49 more: $23,815 · Other+49 moreAACA MUSEUM INC: $7,100 · Arts & CultureOLD STURBRIDGE INC: $1,540 · Arts & CultureWORCESTER ART MUSEUM: $1,050 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC: $2,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthBE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC: $3,200 · InternationalWACHUSETT GREENWAYS INC: $2,690 · EnvironmentTECHFORCE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Education$58,950Other$62,740Arts & Culture$9,940Health$4,800International$3,200Environment$2,690Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $57,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAACA MUSEUM INC: $7,100 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC: $3,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWACHUSETT GREENWAYS INC: $2,690 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLD STURBRIDGE INC: $1,540 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTECHFORCE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE: $1,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWachusett Food Pantry Inc: $1,300 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER ART MUSEUM: $1,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOSTON HOME INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AACA MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BE LIKE BRIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WACHUSETT GREENWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TECHFORCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENDICOTT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Wachusett Food Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSH THIBODEAU HELPING HEARTS FOUNDA ↗
  • Who funds SPREAD TRUTH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert E Evans and Kathleen K Evans Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert E Evans and Kathleen K Evans Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wachusett Greenways Inc: 51% of income from government
  • The Boston Home Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Old Sturbridge Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Neads Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Endicott College: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester Art Museum: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert E Evans and Kathleen K Evans Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph