· Private foundation
The Robert & Betty Wo Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| THE QUEEN'S HEALTH SYSTEMS | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN HOME FURNISHINGS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION INC | $40,000 |
| VOLUNTEER ALLY | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY CHURCH OF HONOLULU | $11,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| REHAB FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $5,000 |
| ASSETS SCHOOL | $3,500 |
| CENTRAL UNION CHURCH | $3,000 |
| IOLANI SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| THE PANTRY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $291k · revenue +56%
- TQTHE QUEEN'S HEALTH SYSTEMS3× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +88%
- AHAMERICAN HOME FURNISHINGS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION INC5× · 2019–2025 · $140k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII CULINARYone grant, 2017 · $50k
- KCKUNIA COUNTRY FARM EDUCATIONAL OUTREACHone grant, 2017 · $10k
- FHFEEDING HAWAII TOGETHERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Palliative care is a win-win-win-win. expanding access to palliative care benefits all parts of the healthcare system. people living with serious illness are better able to manage physical and emotional symptoms and have peace of mind that…
The hawai'i association of independent schools (hais) advocates on behalf of independent education in hawaii, provides services that strengthen individual schools and engages them to achieve educational quality and excellence for all…
Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…
The mission of pali momi foundation is to create a healthier hawai'i.
Hawaii medical association is dedicated to serving physicians, their patients and community through representation, advocacy, and public service. core activities: advocacy, education
Hawaii pacific university is an international learning community set in the rich cultural context of hawaii. students from around the world join us for an american education built on a liberal arts foundation. our innovative undergraduate…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kahala Nui Senior Living Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grove Farm Company Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE QUEEN'S HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HOME FURNISHINGS HALL OF FAME FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIAMOND HEAD THEATRE ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER ALLY ↗
- Who funds PUNAHOU SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds 'IOLANI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MILLS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds ASSETS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Pacific & Asian Affairs Council ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAWAII LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE PANTRY ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FEEDING HAWAII TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds PALOLO CHINESE HOME ↗
- Who funds KAHALA NUI SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA -- ALOHA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Hawai'i Pacific Health ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN WOMEN FOR INTERNATIONAL UNDERSTANDING ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds GROVE FARM COMPANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds COMMON GRACE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: J Watumull Fund · Tradewind Group Foundation · Aloha United Way Inc · McInerny Foundation-- · Chung Kun Ai Foundation · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Ben & Miriam Lau Foundation · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · The James and Juanita Wo Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Robert & Betty Wo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Robert & Betty Wo Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Robert & Betty Wo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.