Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert and Bernadette Hohman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2018
8
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$90k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of The Robert and Bernadette Hohman Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Robert and Bernadette Hohman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $114k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
5
’18
1
’21
1
’22
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$922kEducation$211kReligion$49kOther$0
02FY2018 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k7 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$3,497
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARY STAR OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL$90,000
DOMINICAN SISTER'S OF PEACE$3,497
Individual grant recipient$3,497
JUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL$3,497
ST MICHAELS ABBEY$3,497
CONCEPTION SEMINARY COLLEGE$3,497
MARIANIST MISSION$3,497
PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART$3,497
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST MICHAELS ABBEY: $4k → 10%MARY STAR OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL: $90k → 14%Pontifical North American College: $10k → 14%Ave Maria University: $10k → 10%CONCEPTION SEMINARY COLLEGE: $3k → 17%Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe: $2k → 12%Priests of the Sacred Heart: $10k → 17%Schwab Charitable: $538k → 3%ST BERNARD-ST MARY PARISH: $4k → 13%DOMINICAN SISTER'S OF PEACE: $3k → 15%Urbi et Orbi Communications: $2k → 10%INSIDE THE VATICAN: $3k → 11%ST MICHAELS ABBEY: $3k → 10%MARY STAR OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 14%PONTIFICAL NORTH AMERICAN COLLEGE: $4k → 14%PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART: $4k → 17%Schwab Charitable: $384k → 3%OUR LADY OF THE ELMS: $4k → 13%MARY STAR OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 14%PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART: $3k → 17%ST PAUL PARISH: $4k → 13%Mary Star of the Sea High School: $16k → 14%JUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
OH
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 5 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2018, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$225k
$11k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MARY OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2018–2024 · $181k
  • PO
    PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART
    3× · 2017–2024 · $17k
  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE US
    2× · 2017–2024 · $14k

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE ELMS
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • SB
    ST BERNARD-ST MARY PARISH
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • SP
    ST PAUL PARISH
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $922,311 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCMARY OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL: $180,600 · OtherMARY OF THE SEA HIGH SCH…PRIESTS OF THE SACRED HEART: $17,004 · OtherPRIESTS OF THE SACRED HE…AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE US: $13,507 · Other+11 more: $42,517 · Other+11 moreAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 · Education
Philanthropy$922,311Other$253,628Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $922,311 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBI ET ORBI COMMUNICATIONS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds URBI ET ORBI COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert and Bernadette Hohman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert and Bernadette Hohman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Ave Maria University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Robert and Bernadette Hohman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Robert and Bernadette Hohman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert and Bernadette Hohman’s filings →

More from the funding graph