Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Riedl Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$47kHealth$47kHuman Services$27kFood & Nutrition$19kHousing & Shelter$14kPhilanthropy$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kEnvironment$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
16
States reached
$560k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP SUPERFLY$5,000
WHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST$1,060
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,045
GRAND CENTRAL STATION$1,030
WHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS$1,000
ISLAND SENIOR SERVICES$1,000
Individual grant recipient$680
SAN JUAN PRESERVAION TRUST$517
SNOISLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$517
WAIF WHIDBEY ANIMALS INMPROVEMENT F$515
DECEPTION PASS PARK FOUNDATION$511
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $500 → 14%COLLABRIA CARE: $1k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $1k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $500 → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
SD
IA
PA
CT
CA
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$144k · 55 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
54

Total granted

$144k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+10%

Still filing today

36%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OM
    ONE MIND AT WORK INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +1%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +138%
  • CC
    COLLABRIA CARE
    3× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • PC
    PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUN
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • GF
    GRIZZLY FLATS FIRE SAFE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
5
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
6
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
7
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
11
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
12
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Deception Pass Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
30/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $12,400 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONTHE LORD'S DINER: $11,322 · OtherTHE LORD'S DINERST ANTHONY'S CATHOLIC CHURCHSHELTE: $7,800 · OtherST ANTHONYS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $7,125 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORS: $6,589 · OtherPROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUN: $5,950 · Other+119 more: $124,599 · Other+119 moreAuction Napa Valley Collective Napa Valley: $8,961 · HealthONE MIND AT WORK INC: $3,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $850 · Health+6 more: $1,100 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCALISTOGA COMMUNITY CHEST: $1,500 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $2,850 · EnvironmentWHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST: $2,060 · EnvironmentTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $1,547 · Environment+2 more: $200 · EnvironmentREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $2,000 · Food & NutritionWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES: $2,000 · Food & NutritionCOLLABRIA CARE: $2,600 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $500 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $250 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $250 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesSOUTH WHIDBEY HOMELESS COALITION: $3,175 · Housing & Shelter
Other$175,785Health$16,411Philanthropy$12,500Environment$6,657Food & Nutrition$4,000Human Services$3,650Housing & Shelter$3,175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAuction Napa Valley Collective Napa Valley: $8,961 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONE MIND AT WORK INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH WHIDBEY HOMELESS COALITION: $3,175 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $2,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLABRIA CARE: $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCope Family Center: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS AND HAMMERS: $2,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST: $2,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKansans For Life Inc: $1,750 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $1,547 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALISTOGA COMMUNITY CHEST: $1,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN CENTER OF SANTA ANA: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,142 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST MARITIME CENTER: $1,022 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNapa Valley Vintners: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALISTOGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINE COUNTRY ANIMALS LOVERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHI MU FOUNDATION INC: $949 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $630 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $590 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDeception Pass Park Foundation: $511 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPartnership 4 Kids Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNO-ISLE LIBRARIES FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHIDBEY ISLAND DANCE THEATRE: $290 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPA COUNTY LAND TRUST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Auction Napa Valley Collective Napa Valley ↗
  • Who funds ONE MIND AT WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH WHIDBEY HOMELESS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLABRIA CARE ↗
  • Who funds Cope Family Center ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS AND HAMMERS ↗
  • Who funds WHIDBEY CAMANO LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WHIDBEY ISLAND NOURISHES ↗
  • Who funds Kansans For Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA16× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Whidbey Community Foundation · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Tinyblue Foundation · California Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Riedl Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Riedl Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Riedl Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Riedl Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Riedl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph