· Private foundation
The Richard G and Janet J Andre Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of THE RICHARD G AND JANET J ANDRE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH | $15,000 |
| STEP FORWARD SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $10,000 |
| MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| MOUNT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH | $5,000 |
| ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPI | $2,000 |
| NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESE | $2,000 |
| CHATAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,000 |
| BAPTISTS ON MISSION | $1,000 |
| SEMPER FI FUND | $500 |
| BAPTISTS ON MISSION | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $120k · revenue +0%- SFSTEP FORWARD SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC6× · 2019–2024 · $43k · revenue +82%
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- UPUNIVERSITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $5k
- VFVEREIN FORUM NEUE KUNST OLDENBURG Eone grant, 2021 · $4k
- FDFORDERVEREIN DES OPERA FESTIVALS OBone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.
To support and promote the efforts of the santa fe symphony orchestra & chorus inc
To further the operatic art form by presenting ensemble performances of the highest quality in a varied repertoire of new as well as rarely performed and standard works, to ensure excellence of opera's future through its apprentice…
To support Santa Fe Concert Association, DBA: Performance Santa Fe
To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.
To receive and hold the endowment of the north carolina symphony society, inc. (the "society"), solicit additions to the endowment, safeguard assets, and expend funds for the exclusive use and benefit of the society.
The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Santa fe pro musica brings together outstanding musicians to inspire and educate audiences of all ages through the performance of great music.
Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…
The santa fe conservation trust partners with our community to keep northern new mexico's living lands and people flourishing together. we protect culturally and environmentally significant landscapes, ignite people's passion for nature…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival Ltd and the most unlike its peers is New Orleans Childrens Chorus Co Cheryl Dupont. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STEP FORWARD SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS CHILDRENS CHORUS CO CHERYL DUPONT ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA BARN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chatham Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA OPERA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Abeles Foundation · Mickey Inbody Charitable Foundation Inc · Gale Family Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Texas Instruments Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Richard G and Janet J Andre Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.