Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Richard & Rebecca Evans Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$75kEducation$72kAnimals$24kHealth$24kFood & Nutrition$14kReligion$10kArts & Culture$9kPhilanthropy$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k48 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$200
Median grant
14
States reached
$760k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FULTON MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,600
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST$6,000
ONE CHURCH STREET$5,000
AUDUBON$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$5,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,500
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$3,000
WILDERNESS SOCIETY$2,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$1,500
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$1,015
ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM$1,000
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$1,000
RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
NY
MA
NV
WY
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CO
NE
VA
MD
DC
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$283k · 51 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
26

Total granted

$283k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-2%

Still filing today

55%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsInternationalEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    6× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +139%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +28%
  • RF
    REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • JA
    JAMES A BRENNAN HUMAN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
7
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
8
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
9
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
12
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Green Hill Cemetery Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FULTON MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $33,000 · OtherFULTON MONTGOMERY COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $31,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERSTIndividual grant recipient: $29,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $17,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $13,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAUDUBON: $12,750 · OtherAUDUBONONE CHURCH STREET: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+57 more: $41,530 · Other+57 moreENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE …THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $4,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY+3 more: $1,500 · EnvironmentREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $11,829 · Food & NutritionRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $1,300 · Food & NutritionDefenders of Wildlife: $3,750 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $3,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,815 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY COUNTY SPCA: $700 · Animals+1 more: $200 · AnimalsTHE ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM: $7,000 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $886 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $4,000 · EducationCROSS' MILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $400 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $200 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,200 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,025 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $600 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $100 · International
Other$197,780Environment$70,500Food & Nutrition$13,129Animals$10,465Arts & Culture$7,886Education$4,600International$2,925

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $11,829 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,815 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,025 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $1,015 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF FULTON COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $886 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSALT PONDS COALITION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY SPCA: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDESIGNXRI: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE THE BAY INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS' MILLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Medical Angels: $365 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT POTTER LEAGUE FOR ANIMALS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AINE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN HILL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEREGRINE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF FULTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Richard & Rebecca Evans Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Richard & Rebecca Evans Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Richard & Rebecca Evans Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Richard & Rebecca Evans Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard & Rebecca Evans Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph