· Private foundation
The Richard A & Helene M Monaghan Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k13 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $146k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+1 grant · $257k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GUADALUPE CENTER INC | $257,000 |
| CAMPAIGN FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS | $100,000 |
| CAMP HARBOR VIEW | $50,000 |
| NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| CHANTICLEER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| COREY C GRIFFIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| NVNA AND HOSPICE | $15,000 |
| WE CAN CORPORATION | $10,750 |
| SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH OF BOSTON | $10,000 |
| CLERGY TRUST | $10,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| MCKERYN BRIDGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MEDICINES FOR HUMANITY | $10,000 |
| SOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM INC | $10,000 |
| Michael D Reilley Scholarship Foundation Inc | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $478k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGuadalupe Center Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $432k · revenue +74%
- CHCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +224%
- NVNorwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- GCGUADALUPE CENTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +63%
- CCCorey C Griffin Foundationone grant, 2020 · $25k
- TFTHE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The catholic schools foundation changes lives by providing families with demonstrated financial need an opportunity to give thier sons and daughters a quality education, focused on christian values and character formation at catholic…
The red sox foundation's mission is to harness the passion of red sox nation to make a difference in the lives of children, veterans, families and our communities in need throughout new england by improving their health, educational and…
The sarnoff cardiovascular research foundation is dedicated to cultivating the next generation of physician-leaders in cardiovascular medicine by funding and supporting medical students and physicians engaged in transformative research.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Nichols college strives to develop tomorrow's leaders through a dynamic, career-focused business education. the college transforms students into successful graduates who respond to challenges, are eager for responsibility, and assume…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Noble and Greenough School and the most unlike its peers is Lucas Cup Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COREY C GRIFFIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Norwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHANTICLEER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds WE CAN CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BRAVE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ADOPT A STUDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SHORE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds IMPACT MELANOMA INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MARY'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds MCKERYN BRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Michael D Reilley Scholarship Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Crossroads Foundation NRP ↗
- Who funds South Shore Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LUCAS CUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PALS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEDY'S TEAM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Cordelia Family Foundation LTD · Suffolk Cares Charitable Foundation Inc · GivenGain Foundation USA · Boston Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Richard A & Helene M Monaghan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Impact Melanoma Inc — 3% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- South Shore Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
- We Can Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.