Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Reuel and Oteka Little Family Foundation (Formerly Jack Little Fdn)

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Health$24kPhilanthropy$15kEducation$10kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$6kCrime & Legal$4kYouth Development$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,184
Median grant
5
States reached
$362k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSSM FOUNDATION$8,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL$5,000
GLOBAL FAITH PROJECT$2,500
NATIONAL SAND BASS FESTIVAL$2,000
HER HOPE RISING INC$1,250
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OKLAHOMA$1,184
OPERATION SMILE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$300
OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS$200
BLUE KNIGHTS OK VIII$100
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MADILL COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 9 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$104k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+22%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25’26
Crime & LegalHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GLOBAL FAITH PROJECT INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $14k · revenue +79%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +19%
  • MC
    Marshall County Hospital Foundation
    2× · 2018–2022 · $8k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • OS
    OKLAHOMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • OI
    Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
2
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
3
Project Orphans Inc dba Tulsa Girls Home

We exist to provide: 1. Community development & care to orphans, vulnerable children, powerless young-women and broken families located in Uganda, Africa. 2. The highest quality residential care for girls needing placement outside their…

Religion
4
Oral Health International Foundation
—
5
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc

To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.

Education
7
The Children's Hospital Volunteers

Our mission is to improve the lives of children in oklahoma with support focused on the patients and families at the children's hospital. being a patient can be a scary, overwhelming, not-so-fun time--away from home, school, friends and…

—
8
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
9
Halo Project International Foundation

Organizations Mission: HALO Project believes there is hope for every child and family to experience healing through connection. Every day we equip families and community partners with proven methods to work toward individual healing and…

Human Services
10
Oklahoma Parents Center Inc

The programs and services of OPC are based on the concept of educating parents to improve their child's quality of life. Our mission is to train, educate and support parents, families, professionals and consumers in building partnerships…

Health
11
Stc Healthcare Partners Llc

Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…

Health
12
Orphans Hope International
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Faith Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OSSM FOUNDATION: $52,100 · OtherOSSM FOUNDATIONSMILE TRAIN INC: $13,930 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCNATIONAL SAND BASS FESTIVAL: $7,935 · OtherNATIONAL SAND BASS FESTIVALTHOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherTHOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOLOKLAHOMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $5,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF+13 more: $9,345 · Other+13 moreGLOBAL FAITH PROJECT INC: $14,000 · PhilanthropyGLOBAL FAITH…Marshall County Hospital Foundation: $8,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $5,674 · Recreation & SportsOklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy: $2,500 · Crime & LegalHer Hope Rising Inc: $1,250 · Crime & LegalMADILL COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE 14 FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$93,310Philanthropy$14,000Health$8,100Recreation & Sports$5,674Crime & Legal$3,750Human Services$2,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL FAITH PROJECT INC: $14,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $13,930 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarshall County Hospital Foundation: $8,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $5,674 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMADILL COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL FAITH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Marshall County Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy ↗
  • Who funds MADILL COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE 14 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Her Hope Rising Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Reuel and Oteka Little Family Foundation (Formerly Jack Little Fdn) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Reuel and Oteka Little Family Foundation (Formerly Jack Little Fdn). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reuel and Oteka Little Family Foundation (Formerly Jack Little Fdn)’s filings →

More from the funding graph