· Private foundation
The Reuel and Oteka Little Family Foundation (Formerly Jack Little Fdn)
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of THE REUEL AND OTEKA LITTLE FAMILY FOUNDATION (FORMERLY JACK LITTLE FDN)’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OSSM FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| GLOBAL FAITH PROJECT | $2,500 |
| NATIONAL SAND BASS FESTIVAL | $2,000 |
| HER HOPE RISING INC | $1,250 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OKLAHOMA | $1,184 |
| OPERATION SMILE | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS | $200 |
| BLUE KNIGHTS OK VIII | $100 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGLOBAL FAITH PROJECT INC5× · 2022–2026 · $14k · revenue +79%
SMILE TRAIN INC2× · 2017–2018 · $14k · revenue +19%- MCMarshall County Hospital Foundation2× · 2018–2022 · $8k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- OSOKLAHOMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAFone grant, 2018 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
- OIOklahoma Institute for Child Advocacyone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
We exist to provide: 1. Community development & care to orphans, vulnerable children, powerless young-women and broken families located in Uganda, Africa. 2. The highest quality residential care for girls needing placement outside their…
To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.
Our mission is to improve the lives of children in oklahoma with support focused on the patients and families at the children's hospital. being a patient can be a scary, overwhelming, not-so-fun time--away from home, school, friends and…
Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…
Organizations Mission: HALO Project believes there is hope for every child and family to experience healing through connection. Every day we equip families and community partners with proven methods to work toward individual healing and…
The programs and services of OPC are based on the concept of educating parents to improve their child's quality of life. Our mission is to train, educate and support parents, families, professionals and consumers in building partnerships…
Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits Inc and the most unlike its peers is Global Faith Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL FAITH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds Marshall County Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy ↗
- Who funds MADILL COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE 14 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Her Hope Rising Inc ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Reuel and Oteka Little Family Foundation (Formerly Jack Little Fdn) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.