Skip to content
The Resource Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Resource Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
70
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$209k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.6MEducation$1.2MHealth$553kArts & Culture$492kEnvironment$359kHousing & Shelter$325kFood & Nutrition$250kAnimals$209kOther$0
02FY2024 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k42 grants · $145k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $501k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $377k
$5,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY CENTERS$208,980
VAUGHN COLLEGE$100,000
KIDS IN CRISIS$68,250
HORIZONS AT BRUNSWICK SCHOOL$44,789
GREENWICH ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION$43,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$40,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH$30,000
GREENWICH LAND TRUST$30,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$27,625
WATERSIDE SCHOOL$26,250
RIVER HOUSE$25,000
GREENWICH DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES FUND$25,000
ERIC CARLE MUSEUM OF PICTURE BOOK ART INC$21,000
STUDIO INSTITUTE$21,000
Individual grant recipient$15,766
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $551k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $16k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $15k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $15k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $10k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $10k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $40k → 9%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $10k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 9%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $10k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 9%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $8k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 9%PATHWAYS: $1k → 17%GUIDING EYES: $35k → 9%NEW LIFE OF NEW YORK CITY: $525 → 17%GUIDING EYES: $35k → 9%NEW LIFE OF NEW YORK CITY: $500 → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 9%NEW LIFE OF NEW YORK CITY: $500 → 17%GUIDING EYES: $35k → 9%PHILOXENIA INC: $1k → 9%PHILOXENIA INC: $1k → 9%PHILOXENIA INC: $1k → 9%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $16k → 9%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $15k → 9%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $15k → 9%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $15k → 9%NEW LIFE OF NEW YORK CITY: $500 → 17%NEW LIFE OF NEW YORK CITY: $500 → 17%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $10k → 9%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $9k → 9%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $9k → 9%TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $9k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $3k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $3k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $3k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $11k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $10k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $10k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $10k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $8k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $5k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $5k → 9%AT HOME IN GREENWICH: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 103 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

103 repeat relationships: 69 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
50

Total granted

$5.8M
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+30%

Still filing today

59%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY CENTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $823k · revenue +141%
  • WS
    WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $331k · revenue +34%
  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Cedars Camps Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $26k · revenue +10%
  • SI
    STUDIO IN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TL
    THE LITTLE PINK SHELTER
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Greenwich House Inc

Greenwich house responds to the urgent, ongoing, and diverse needs of our community by offering health, human services, education, and arts programs that foster wellness, creativity, and connection.

—
3
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
4
Community Solutions Inc

Positively impacting the lives of our clients and their communities by providing services that facilitate skill development, enhance responsible citizenship, and increase overall well-being.

Health
5
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Garnet Health

To maintain an integrated health delivery system of providers and hospitals resulting in improved health for our community by providing exceptional healthcare to our patients.

Health
8
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
12
United Services Inc

United services mission is to provide an effective response to the youth, family, and adult social and behavioral health needs in the community. united services is the most comprehensive private, non-profit center in connecticut providing…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbor to Neighbor Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Cedar School Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/88
Grantees still filing
62/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY CENTERS INC: $822,860 · OtherFAMILY CENTERS INCVAUGHN COLLEGE: $315,000 · OtherVAUGHN COLLEGEKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $268,250 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS INC+118 more: $2,442,514 · Other+118 moreWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $331,250 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHO…VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY: $213,900 · EducationVAUGHN COLLEGE…GREENWICH ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION INC: $93,750 · EducationGREENWICH ALLI…BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $79,789 · EducationBRUNSWICK SCHO…NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Education+2 more: $15,000 · EducationGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $285,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EY…THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $96,450 · Human ServicesTHE TRANSP…PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $93,250 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BE…AT HOME IN GREENWICH INC: $61,000 · Human ServicesAT HOME IN…+5 more: $20,775 · Human ServicesTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $297,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $16,000 · EnvironmentGREENWICH GREEN & CLEAN INC: $14,100 · Environment+2 more: $7,300 · EnvironmentTHE ERIC CARLE MUSEUM OF PICTURE BOOK ART INC: $115,000 · Arts & CultureGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $46,012 · Arts & CultureGREENWICH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $34,250 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER PLAYERS OF THE GREENWICH SYMPHONY INC: $16,200 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $10,784 · Arts & CultureAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $105,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE FAMILY CENTRE INC: $37,300 · InternationalTHESSALONICA AGRICULTURAL & INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE (THE AMERICAN FARM SCHOOL): $19,775 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalGREENWICH DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FUND INC: $130,255 · PhilanthropyFoundations in Education Inc: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,025 · Philanthropy
Other$3,848,624Education$763,689Human Services$556,475Environment$334,900Arts & Culture$302,246International$163,575Philanthropy$141,280

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC: $822,860 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $331,250 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $297,500 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $285,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $268,250 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetVAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY: $213,900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGREENWICH DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FUND INC: $130,255 over 7y, 23% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $115,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ERIC CARLE MUSEUM OF PICTURE BOOK ART INC: $115,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HILL HOUSE INC: $113,250 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $105,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE IN MOTION INC: $100,250 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetTHE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH: $96,450 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetGREENWICH ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION INC: $93,750 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $93,250 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC: $79,789 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $70,770 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetAT HOME IN GREENWICH INC: $61,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetMEALS-ON-WHEELS INC: $58,375 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetLAUREL HOUSE INC: $53,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $51,510 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC: $50,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF NATHANIEL WITHERELL INC: $50,250 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetABILIS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CEDAR SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $50,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $46,012 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCall-A-Ride of Greenwich Inc: $42,925 over 5y, 10% of budgetSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC: $40,300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY REENTRY INC: $40,200 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetADOPT-A-DOG INC: $37,895 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FAMILY CENTRE INC: $37,300 over 6y, 22% of budgetGREENWICH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $34,250 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPATHWAYS INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LITTLE PINK SHELTER INC: $21,000 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetOPIN INC: $20,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetTHESSALONICA AGRICULTURAL & INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE (THE AMERICAN FARM SCHOOL): $19,775 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENWICH: $17,625 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCOFFEE FOR GOOD INC: $17,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCHAMBER PLAYERS OF THE GREENWICH SYMPHONY INC: $16,200 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARBARAS HOUSE INC: $15,250 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGREENWICH GREEN & CLEAN INC: $14,100 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetFUTURE 5 INC: $10,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINSPIRICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds VAUGHN COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ERIC CARLE MUSEUM OF PICTURE BOOK ART INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HILL HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE IN MOTION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION OF GREENWICH ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRUNSWICK SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC ↗
  • Who funds AT HOME IN GREENWICH INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS-ON-WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUREL HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NATHANIEL WITHERELL INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILIS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CEDAR SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Call-A-Ride of Greenwich Inc ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REENTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Malkin Fund IncCornelia Cogswell Ros…Fairfield County's Co…Panwy Foundation IncRoyce Family Fund IncThe John L and Sue An…Oppenheim Family Fund…Dr Joseph J Lawrence …United Way of Greenwi…The William J and Fra…The per and Astrid He…Dalio Family Fund Inc
Malkin Fund IncNY40.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Malkin Fund Inc · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Panwy Foundation Inc · Royce Family Fund Inc · The John L and Sue Ann Weinberg Foundation · Oppenheim Family Fund Inc · Dr Joseph J Lawrence Trust Diana Serrell Trustee · United Way of Greenwich Inc · The William J and Frances E Deutsch Charitable Foundation · The per and Astrid Heidenreich Family Foundation · Dalio Family Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Resource Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Resource Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 240%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Abilis Inc: 74% of income from government
  • Laurel House Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Pacific House Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Pathways Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Services of Greenwich: 41% of income from government
  • Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Inspirica Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Hill House Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Barbaras House Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich: 7% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Soundwaters Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Greenwich Alliance for Education Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Greenwich Symphony Orchestra Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
24get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Resource Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Resource Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Resource’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home