· Public charity
The Research Foundation
THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION invests in health-centered programs and partnerships that benefit health care students and professionals, patients, and people in the kansas city community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 36 grants below total $1,227,746 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,791,986 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $564,240 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $573k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOTHER'S REFUGE | $50,000 |
| CARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD | $50,000 |
| SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER | $50,000 |
| ROSE BROOKS CENTER | $50,000 |
| ABILITY KC | $50,000 |
| KANSAS CITY CARE CLINIC DBA KC CARE HEALTH CENTER | $50,000 |
| NEWHOUSE | $50,000 |
| PREP-KC | $50,000 |
| HOPE FAMILY CARE CENTER | $50,000 |
| VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT | $50,000 |
| JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY | $50,000 |
| METRO LUTHERAN MINISTRY | $50,000 |
| CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC | $50,000 |
| OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC | $45,000 |
| CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION (CAPA) | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKansas City CARE Clinic4× · 2017–2024 · $154k · revenue +312%
- OBOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC2× · 2023–2024 · $129k · revenue +9%
- AKABILITY KC2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- MVMIDWEST VETERANS' BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $51k · revenue -8%
- MRMATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTERone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +11%
- MVMISSION VISION PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
Provide high quality medical, behavioral health, and dental services that are affordable, accessible, and patient-focused.
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
To provide advocacy services to LGBTQ victims and survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and hate crimes.
Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.
Our mission is to create an environment where all citizens can live safely and have access to real opportunities.
Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mattie Rhodes Memorial Society D/B/a Mattie Rhodes Center and the most unlike its peers is Partnership for Regional Educational Preparation - Kansas City Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Kansas City CARE Clinic ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds ABILITY KC ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEWHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds HOPE FAMILY CARE CENTER LLC ↗
- Who funds Mothers Refuge ↗
- Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds William Jewell College ↗
- Who funds SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SWOPE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds LEVELUP KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLIES HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Amethyst Place Inc ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST VETERANS' BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Front Porch Alliance - Kansas City Inc ↗
- Who funds FIRST CALL ALCOHOLDRUG PREVENTION RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Seton Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Developing Potential Inc ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL PREPARATION - KANSAS CITY INC ↗
- Who funds MATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Kansas City University ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds MISSION VISION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Journey to New Life INC ↗
- Who funds RESTART INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPYBOTTOMS ↗
- Who funds The Battle Within Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAI ↗
- Who funds ALPHAPOINTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · The Sunderland Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Victor E Speas Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Research Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Research Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.