· Private foundation
The Renee & Carl Landegger Family Charit
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of THE RENEE & CARL LANDEGGER FAMILY CHARIT’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA | $5,000 |
| PARITY PRODUCTIONS | $2,500 |
| PRIMARY STAGES | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| PARITY PRODUCTIONS | $2,000 |
| PRIMARY STAGES | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| SOS CHILDRENS VILLAGE FLORIDA | $1,000 |
| NEW LIFE EVANGELICAL OF FLORIDA | $1,000 |
| MAESTRA MUSIC | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| LENOX HILL NEIGBORHOOD HOUSE | $1,000 |
| MAESTRA MUSIC | $1,000 |
| SAMARITAN DAY TOP VILLAGE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LHLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +36%
- PPPARITY PRODUCTIONS INC6× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +20%
MAESTRA MUSIC INC6× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +517%
Funded once
- TJTHE JUNIOR ASSEMBLY COTILLIONone grant, 2022 · $12k
- NYNEW YORK CITY CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -7%
- NFNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR CATHOLICone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
NYFOS is dedicated to creating intimate song concerts of great beauty and originality, weaving music, poetry, history and humor into unforgettable evenings of compelling theater, entertaining, educating and creating community among…
Caramoor's mission is to enrich the lives of audiences through innovative and diverse musical performances of the highest quality, mentor young professional musicians, and engage children through interactive educational experiences that…
To provoke, produce and cultivate the work of artists whose visions inspire and challenge all of us.
The apollo theater is a commissioner and presenter; catalyst for new artists, audiences, and creative workforce; and partner in the projection of the african american narrative and its role in the development of american and global…
To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…
Signature theatre celebrates playwrights and gives them an artistic home. signature makes an extended commitment to a playwright's body of work, producing several plays by each resident writer and delivering an intimate and immersive…
To create, to present, to preserve, and to extend the great repertoire of classical dancing through exciting performances and educational programming of the highest quality, presented to the widest possible audience. american ballet…
Mtc's work includes producing and developing new work on and off-broadway, nurturing artists throughout their careers, and positively impacting the lives of many through innovative education programs. we are committed to equity, diversity…
A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.
See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Princess Grace Foundation - Usa and the most unlike its peers is The Tom Gold Dance Foundation 51 West 81ST Street. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Primary Stages Company Inc ↗
- Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
- Who funds PARITY PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAESTRA MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds VIENNESE OPERA BALL ↗
- Who funds The Theatre of the Emerging American Moment Inc ↗
- Who funds THE TOM GOLD DANCE FOUNDATION 51 WEST 81ST STREET ↗
- Who funds THE ELM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds STUTTERING ASSOCIATION FOR THE YOUNG INC ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
- Who funds MARBLE HOUSE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN DAYTOP VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds SILVERMINE GUILD OF ARTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAM HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds ONE LARCHMONT INC ↗
- Who funds URYADIS VILLAGE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Barker Welfare Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ford Foundation · American Express Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Renee & Carl Landegger Family Charit funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Silvermine Guild of Artists Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Ballet Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Renee & Carl Landegger Family Charit?
Find your warmest path to The Renee & Carl Landegger Family Charit through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.